When I bought the new furnace I decided on the deluxe model from Carrier; the Infinity 80. It has many nice bells and whistles, all of which as far as I can tell are actually useful. It’s a well thought out product. It wasn’t the most energy efficient model (which was the Infinity 96), but that one would have cost me thousands more all told, for all the other modifications to the house I’d have had to make and I couldn’t justify it. But the one I bought was supposed to be able to monitor both the inside and outside temperature over a period of time, and set its burn rate and fan speed to the most efficient (and hopefully less costly) way to heat and cool the house. So I bought the furnace that burned a bit more efficiently then the one I had, with extra features that hopefully make it even more efficient in use. BGE Home installed it Tuesday after New Year. Hopefully the technician they sent over yesterday finally got it working.

Swear to God, every time I catch myself thinking Things are different then when I was a kid I just want to smack myself. I’m Not That Old! But I traded a simple Honeywell round thermostat for a device that looks a bit like an iPod attached to my wall, only with a bigger LCD display and lots more buttons. It tells me what the temperature is inside. It tells me what the temperature is outside. It tells me what temperature I’ve set the heat to. I can program it to different heat settings for various times of the day, for each individual day of the week, or for every day during the weekday and every day during the weekend. I can keep the heat low when I’m asleep, or at work. I can create a completely separate set of heating points for vacation. It’s actually quite simple to program. It tells me when the furnace is on. It tells me if the fan is going, and at what speed. It tells me what the humidity is. It’ll tell me when the media in my electronic air filter needs cleaning. And ever since they installed it, it’s been telling me to call for a service technician to fix it.

System malfunction - Call for service.

I can press a combination of buttons and get a more precise diagnosis, or I can go into the basement and read the error code directly off the furnace. And no…I don’t have all this memorized. Lately I’ve had to keep the instruction manual near my…uh, thermostat device thing. What’s it called again? Ah…right…it’s the Carrier Infinity Control So I have a control unit now, instead of just a plain old thermostat. And it not only came with an instruction booklet…inside the instruction booklet is a quick start guide. Dig it. My new furnace has a quick start guide.

The error code it was throwing, 33, meant that at the low heat/low fan setting the heat exchanger was going over temperature. That threw the furnace into a mode where it would only operate at high heat and high fan speed…exactly like the old furnace did. Efficiency was out the window, but at least I had heat. The probable causes were maddeningly all over the map. Something could be impeding air flow into the furnace, or air flow out of it. Something could be impeding the draw up the chimney. The dual setting burner valve could be malfunctioning. Gas pressure could be set just a tad wrong. Over the past couple weeks the technicians from BGE Home have tried everything. Making matters worse was that the problem could take hours to develop. A technician would leave my house thinking they’d finally fixed it, only to have the error code pop out again four or five hours later.

Finally, yesterday, BGE Home brought out a big gun…a high ranking technician who knew this particular model. He spent about four hours with it yesterday afternoon carefully monitoring the temperature rise in the heat exchanger and tweaking this and that, until finally deciding that it was a combination of improper settings on the PC board, and too much bypass air going through the humidifier. As I watched him turning on and off the furnace to reset the PC board in it so he could test it some more, a thought occurred to me and I had to go sit down.

He’s rebooting my furnace. I have a furnace that boots. I don’t just switch on the furnace, I boot it up… And sure enough, as the furnace was switched on my Control Unit displayed various messages while polling the…uhm…peripherals, of entire system…the compressor, the humidifier, the air filter. You could watch it booting up. My mom used to tell me stories about how she and her brothers shoveled coal into their parent’s coal fired furnace, and cleaned out the ash trap. In point of fact, many of the old row houses over in Hampden, just a short walk from my neighborhood, still have their coal door. I have a furnace with a computer in it that’s probably more powerful then the one that calculated the descent of two astronauts to the surface of the moon back in 1969. And all it does is figure out how to maintain temperature inside my little rowhouse.

My humidifier, a Honeywell Enviracaire (somebody please smack the marketer who invented that word…), uses a fibrous pad that is fed water when the furnace comes on. Air is blown through the pad and into the return air duct, just above where it goes into the furnace. It’s a good system in that it uses no water reservoir where mold and germs can get growing, and there is no water spray from it that can cause corrosion in the furnace itself. But the air going through the media has to come from somewhere and it needs to be somewhat forceful. You can use a fan to push air through it and into the return flow, but it would have to be a big one. A better way is to tap the some of the air coming out of the furnace and route it back through the humidifier. But that air is hot. So you’re basically adding heat to the return air. You can tweak the system to account for that, but it’s a rather fine adjustment of a valve on the humidifier air intake, and switches that control how the furnace ramps itself up to running temperature. Apparently this was all off by just enough to make the heat exchanger run too hot at the low burner/low fan setting. At least, that’s the current theory.

A furnace, even one of the old ones, needs to be recognized as a part of a system that includes your duct work and how big the house is and how it gains or looses heat. You can’t just throw something in and expect it to be as efficient as possible, and if things are grossly mismatched it might not even work at all. And the more efficiency you want to wring out of the system, the more deftly you have to tweak the various parts of it. And that means the whole thing becomes a bit touchy. One of the reasons I’m not blowing a fuse over how long it’s taken to get everything to work is that I kinda saw this coming. I figured there would be a period of adjustment, I was just hoping it wouldn’t be as long as this. This new furnace is a lot more touchy then I’d reckoned on.

My old habits of opening and closing various vents throughout the house will make this furnace throw that same error code. I just can’t disturb the air flow. I have to keep everything open now, and let the furnace do its work if I want it to run at that super efficient low burner/low fan setting. Which is fine, it’s just a habit I need to change. It actually makes the house nice and comfortable when it can run in that mode most of the time. You can’t even hear it running it’s so low. Yet the house is nice and cozy now. And with the humidifier running, I can keep the temperature setting down about five degrees and still feel very warm and snug. And I’m not shooting sparks off whenever I touch something that’s metal now. Thanks to the humidifier the static electricity I usually get when the furnace is on is gone completely. When I switch from AC to heat again next winter, I’ll have to remember to set the humidifier airflow valve correctly (it needs to be turned off completely in the summer). Mom would tell me it beats cleaning out an ash trap.

So I’m watching Logo and the perky Logo/CBS news droid comes on and one of the stories he tells me about is that there are a gosh awful lot of gay themed short films coming out of Sundance this year. The spot goes on to show a few clips from one of them, Bug Crush which the film maker cheerfully describes as the story of a young gay boy’s first high school crush that turns dark and sinister…

Swell. Just swell. Can’t have enough sinister darkness when it comes to stories about gay kids and their first high school romances can you? Is Exodus sponsoring Sundance this year?

I’m at the point now where I think you should have to have a license to make a film with gay characters in it. You apply for the license and you pay a fee and you fill out a form with these three questions on it:

You flunk the test and you get your license stamped NO GAY MATERIAL, because you really shouldn’t be bothering gay and lesbian people with your crap. Seriously. Go bother heterosexuals. No…strike that…heterosexuals don’t deserve you either. Go bother republicans.

Remember how the first thing Canadian winger Stephen Harper said at the beginning of his campaign for Prime Minister was how he was going to make same sex marriage illegal in Canada again? Remember how he stopped talking about same sex marriage throughout the rest of his campaign, to make himself look moderate?

Guess what?

New Canadian PM To Move Quickly On Gay Marriage Repeal

(Ottawa) Stephen Harper says he wants to move quickly as leader of a fractious new Parliament to reopen the same-sex marriage debate.

The makeup of the new House of Commons suggests the prime minister-designate knows there's a good chance such a motion will be rejected.

It would not be a total loss, however. In fact, an honorable defeat on equal marriage would satisfy obligations to Harper's most right-wing supporters while defusing a politically explosive issue.

...

Still, Harper has promises to keep to the most traditional members of his team.

He has said he'll put a free-vote motion before Parliament on whether the heterosexual definition of matrimony should be restored...The Conservatives would then craft legislation to that effect should the motion pass in a sharply divided House of Commons. ...

But at least one Conservative insider who spoke on condition of anonymity said social moderates in the party would welcome the issue's demise.

"There would be a quiet hurrah."

It’d be a relief would it?

Notice what is missing here from this article from the Canadian Press: Any shred of concern for the welfare of gay and lesbian Canadians. And notice that Harper is openly pictured as a man who is merely using the issue to hold onto support from the extreme right. Kinda like our guy in the White House down here, who as I recall also ran as the man to restore ethics to government. But what is ethical about using your fellow citizens as political punching bags for votes, as though their lives, their hopes, their dreams are merely pieces on a political game board? What is ethical about gaming a vote to loose that you’re telling your supporters represents something you stand for. If this is the man some Canadians voted for to restore ethics to government, they’re in for a bitter awakening. Or not. Actually, we’re still waiting for that awakening to happen here in the United States, aren’t we? A moderate more often then not, is someone who doesn’t want to be held responsible for cheap prejudices they know full well ought to be beneath a civilized person.

If anyone in Canada is thinking the gay haters will just go away if they loose this vote they are sadly mistaken. They may not represent the majority of Canadians, or even the majority of Tories, but an American extremist, Ralph Reed, taught their kind some years ago, that they don’t have to be, to make government dance to their tune. They just have to be enough to bring everything down whenever they want. They want the hearts of gay and lesbian Canadians served up to them on a platter, and sooner or later the Tories will have to deliver or loose power. The only question is, will the so called social moderates go from wishing the issue would just go away, to wishing gay people would just go away, as they have here in the United States. This is when you find out who really has a conscience, and who just talks like they know what one is.

I walked away from friends I’d known since college after they voted for Bush in the last election. I had one simple thing to say to them: I am not the “some”, in “some of my best friends are…” I am a human being, with the same need, the same hopes and dreams for love and joy and fulfillment the rest of you have. I need arms to hold me. I need a heart to share with mine. If you vote to take that dream, that hope from me, I don’t give a good goddamn if you dance in its ashes afterward along with the haters or not. I don’t care what your motives were. It’s not the thing you cared about but the thing you didn’t: me. If you could do that to me, you are simply not a friend of mine, and you never were. I don’t know you.

It’s bitter sadness, but there are gay Canadians today, reading the headlines, looking at family and friends, and realizing now that very same thing: I…don’t know you.

Via Pam’s House Blend…

The night Cincinnati City Councilman Sam Malone is accused of beating his son with a belt, he told the 14-year-old boy: "I'm not finished with you," according to Hamilton County court documents.

Malone, who has pleaded not guilty to a misdemeanor charge of domestic violence, was upset that his son was late to a checkpoint while on a school field trip at Paramount's Kings Island on May 13, according to the boy's statement to police.

...

The hospital records detail bruising to his chest, arms, back and buttocks.

The boy told police he fell at one point and Malone continued to hit him.

"I pay for your school, and you bring home poor grades," Malone told his son during the beating, according to the boy's statement. "You're not paying attention."

When his father stopped hitting him, the boy told police Malone told him he wasn't finished with him, adding: "I'm going to whip the black off you."

Shortly after, Malone left his Walnut Hills home, and a boy who also lives with Malone and his son called 911.

...

The domestic-violence charge was not the first for the councilman.

In 1991, he was charged with choking and pushing his mother. That charge was dismissed after he completed a counseling program.

Malone by the way, is black. You gotta wonder about a black man who tells is son he’ll “whip the black off you”. So now the trial begins…

After opening statements, Malone's 14-year-old son testified.

As the former councilman looked on, the teenager recounted what happened in their Walnut Hills home.

In the year before Malone's arrest, the teen said he and his father had had a rocky relationship because he was failing eighth grade. Then the boy missed the checkpoint, prompting his teacher to call Malone.

Malone's son testified that Malone was angry and told him to go upstairs and take his clothes off.

"He started whipping me with a belt, he had it wrapped double on his hand," the teenager said. "He kept on hitting me, and I fell over, and he kept on hitting me."

Asked by Murray to demonstrate how he tried to defend against the blows, the teen crossed his arms against his chest and tucked his head down.

"I was in pain, crying," the teenager said. "He hit me all over, on my back, arms, side, stomach, chest and my legs."

Malone, 35, was arrested after another boy living in his house in Walnut Hills called 911 and said the 14-year-old didn't feel safe there. Malone's son then got on the phone, crying and repeatedly asking the police dispatcher if he'd have to return to the house.

I don’t know what is the more obscene here…a grown man beating the crap out of a fourteen year old boy for missing a goddamn field trip checkpoint or the fact that beating a defenseless half naked child so badly they have to be taken to the hospital is only a misdemeanor in Ohio. That what it means to have red state family values is it?

As you might expect, Malone has a track record of political gay bashing, vehemently opposing the repeal of Cincinnati’s ban on gay rights laws. I wonder how many times he’s babbled that same sex marriage is harmful to children?

Life just isn’t sweet for these people unless they can beat the crap out somebody smaller and weaker then they are.

[Edited a tad…]

Via Atrios, More fun with Tweety…(you have to scroll down the article a bit…)

Gay-rights activists are blasting Don Imus and sidekick Bernard McGuirk as gay-bashers, Last week, when fellow MSNBC talker Chris Matthews asked Imus if he'd seen the cowboy love story "Brokeback Mountain," Imus sneered, "Why would I want to see that?" He added that McGuirk had his own name for the movie - a crude candy reference we'll skip. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation called the "slurs" a "juvenile display of homophobia." MSNBC has apologized for the banter....

Let’s review, again via Atrios:

MATTHEWS (1/18/06): Have you gone to see it yet? I've seen everything else but that. I just...

IMUS: No, I haven't seen it. Why would I want to see that?

MATTHEWS: I don't know. No opinion on that. I haven't seen it either, so...

IMUS: So they were...it was out when I was in New Mexico and...it doesn't resonate with real cowboys who I know.

MATTHEWS: Yeah...

IMUS: But then, maybe there's stuff going on on the ranch that I don't know about. Not on my ranch, but you know...

MATTHEWS: Well, the wonderful Michael Savage, who's on 570 in DC, who shares a station with you at least, he calls it [laughter]...what's he call it?...he calls it Bare-back Mount-ing. That's his name for the movie.

IMUS: Of course, Bernard calls it Fudgepack Mountain...

That wonderful Michael Savage. Heh. Wonderful. Yes. Even more Tweety wonderfulness here and here. I used to think he was just a TV talking head idiot. But no…he’s a thug, just like the rest of them. A Bush base thug. And scratch a Bush base thug and you’ll find a bar stool bigot every fucking time. I guarantee it. When CNN started the first 24 hour cable news network it was hailed as a revolution in journalism. But what you have to realize about revolutions is that most of them end up becoming a tyranny of despots. CNN and MSNBC have been racing each other to the bottom of the gutter ever since Monica, and there is no bottom.

This week’s cartoon…

More on the cartoon page…

I don’t normally look at the utility bill until I’m ready to pay it. But after last month’s 200 plus dollar tab, mostly due to the stratospheric rise in natural gas prices recently, I was wondering how much less I spent during the last period, after having that trouble with my furnace. So I just took an advance peek at this month’s bill.

$320.

WTF!!! I was without heat for a week and a half last period, and the new furnace has been down intermittently ever since they installed it because it still isn’t working right (oh…more on that later I suppose…). And my bill goes up by a hundred dollars? It didn’t make sense. Then I noticed that the last period’s gas usage was Estimated. Not the electric mind you. The electric usage was marked Actual. Only the gas usage was Estimated.

They have never estimated me before. Never. I pay attention to these things. And I have every BGE bill stub from the day I moved into Casa del Garrett back in 2001. Yet the one month when my usage should have been off because of furnace trouble, they suddenly decide to estimate my usage. I’ve no idea what the algorithm is they use to estimate usage…I suspect it’s based on some sort of weighing against past usage verses temperatures for the period. But hell…who knows…? It’s just damn…fishy…that they decided now, of all billing cycles, to estimate my usage. And just the gas usage.

So I reckon I’ll be having a chat with them come Monday morning. I’ve never challenged a utility company bill before. Should be a totally delightful experience.

For the record, my Actual electric usage for the period amounted to about $80 worth. That was up from $43 last period and that makes sense because I was leaning on my electric space heaters for a non-trivial part of it. So the difference was about $37. My electric bill for December of 2004 was about $32. I reckon my space heaters cost me about $35 to $40 to heat the house with them for the 11 days I was without heat, plus the three days I had to take the new furnace out of service. Lets say $40 dollars worth of electricity for two weeks. That would make the space heaters cost about $80 to run for a month. Gas cost me $133 total last period, and about $166 total this one. I don’t think my clothes dryer and my gas range are a big part of that.

This is not a large house! It’s just a little fifteen-hundred square foot rowhouse for chrissakes. 300 plus dollar utility bills just don’t make sense for this little thing. Natural gas must suddenly be more precious per cubic foot then gold nowadays. So I’m going to try heating Casa del Garrett with the space heaters for a while, and see what that buys me. You don’t want to be running space heaters when you’re not home, but I can turn the heat down low so at least my water pipes don’t freeze, and then run the space heaters while I’m home. I’m going to do that for a whole billing period and see what the bill looks like then. 300 plus dollars a month to heat a fifteen hundred square foot house is too goddamn much.

If the space heaters work out cheaper, I might have an electrician come in next summer and put baseboard heaters in, as an alternative to the furnace. Then I could switch between them depending on which is more expensive. But I never thought I’d live to see the day electric heat was cheaper then natural gas.

Just so you know… The Washington Post is a tad annoyed with all of you…

Comments Turned Off

As of 4:15 p.m. ET today, we have shut off comments on this blog indefinitely.

At its inception, the purpose of this blog was to open a dialogue about this site, the events of the day, the journalism of The Washington Post Company and other related issues. Among the things that we knew would be part of that discussion would be the news and opinion coming from the pages of The Washington Post and washingtonpost.com. We knew a lot of that discussion would be critical in nature. And we were fine with that. Great journalism companies need feedback from readers to stay sharp.

But there are things that we said we would not allow, including personal attacks, the use of profanity and hate speech. Because a significant number of folks who have posted in this blog have refused to follow any of those relatively simple rules, we've decided not to allow comments for the time being. It's a shame that it's come to this. Transparency and reasoned debate are crucial parts of the Web culture, and it's a disappointment to us that we have not been able to maintain a civil conversation, especially about issues that people feel strongly (and differently) about.

Blah…blah…blah… It seems the new Ombudsman at the Post is a tad miffed too…

Washington Post ombudsman Deborah Howell has reportedly posted a comment on the Post's internal message board announcing that she has learned the following "lesson" from exchanges with Media Matters for America: "From now on, I don't reply." Howell's language did not make clear whether she meant that she would no longer reply to any criticism, or only to that registered by Media Matters.

...

The "attack" to which Howell is apparently referring is a Media Matters item in which we quoted Howell's January 10 email to us, at her request. Howell claimed in that email that she had previously said that Post reporter Dafna Linzer "was giving the administration's point of view" in her January 4 article. In fact, Howell had previously said that Linzer "was simply giving the administration's point of view as well as others." But with regard to the claim in question, Linzer had not provided the point of view of "others" in her article -- an omission that constitutes the original basis of the entire dispute...

How…uncivil…for Media Matters to tell the Post’s Ombudsman that making lame excuses for slipshod reporting isn’t her job. Meanwhile, over at CNN, they’ve hired yet another right wing talk radio gutter crawler to host a show on their flagship Headline New Service…

On the January 10 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Glenn Beck called anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan "a pretty big prostitute," later amending, at the behest of his executive producer, Steve "Stu" Burguiere, that "tragedy pimp" would be "the most accurate description."

Beck referenced Sheehan during what he called a "search for the biggest prostitute," which, he said, sought to answer the question, "Who'll do anything for power or money?" The game initially pitted former Hollywood madam Heidi Fleiss against Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), and suspended Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver Terrell Owens.

Beck, who claims that his radio show is "ranked as the 3rd most listened to talk show in America among Adults 25-54," was recently hired to host his own program on CNN Headline News.

Take a look at the photo of this guy on the Media Matters site and tell me he doesn’t look like the stereotypical schoolyard bully…the kind that is always threatening the smaller weaker kids for their lunch money, or shoving their faces into their locker doors and laughing.

And just the other day, MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews (aka “Tweety” as he is affectionately known in the blog world), had himself a Brokeback Mountain moment with that prince of the talk radio gutter, Don Imus:

MATTHEWS (1/18/06): Have you gone to see it yet? I've seen everything else but that. I just...

IMUS: No, I haven't seen it. Why would I want to see that?

MATTHEWS: I don't know. No opinion on that. I haven't seen it either, so...

IMUS: So they were...it was out when I was in New Mexico and...it doesn't resonate with real cowboys who I know.

MATTHEWS: Yeah...

IMUS: But then, maybe there's stuff going on on the ranch that I don't know about. Not on my ranch, but you know...

MATTHEWS: Well, the wonderful Michael Savage, who's on 570 in DC, who shares a station with you at least, he calls it [laughter]...what's he call it?...he calls it Bare-back Mount-ing. That's his name for the movie.

IMUS: Of course, Bernard calls it Fudgepack Mountain...

Just in case all you kids out there have forgotten…here’s a wee refresher on The Wonderful Michael Savage…

NEW YORK (AP) - MSNBC on Monday fired Michael Savage for anti-gay comments.

The popular radio talk show host who did a weekend TV show for the cable channel referred to an unidentified caller to his show Saturday as a "sodomite" and said he should "get AIDS and die."

"His comments were extremely inappropriate and the decision was an easy one," MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Gaines said.

But it was eminently typical of Savage, who well before MSNBC waved that fat juicy talk show slot in front of him, had bought himself a reputation as a screaming bigot who said gays are perverts, immigrants are from “Turd World Nations” and Asians are “little soy eaters”. A year after being fired, Savage was heard to say that “radical homosexuals” and “radical Islamists” are “one and the same, they’re all terrorists.” How…wonderful.

Fudge packers. Tragedy pimps. Civil discourse. Without the commercial news media, where would it be? We bloggers should be ashamed of ourselves. Just…ashamed…

When Peterson Toscano came to Baltimore some months ago, he not only gave us his performance of Doin’ Time In The Homo No Mo Halfway House, and Queer 101, but also gave us some glimpses of a work in progress which he was calling then, The Re-Education Of George Bush. In the latter, a character named Marvin, an ex-gay man, leads Bush though a series of topics such as the economy, privilege, environmentalism, the Bible and humanity. What made it work for me was Peterson’s deft capture of the little nuances of character in a person like Marvin, who is from Brooklyn and a strong working class Bush supporter. I’ve met very few committed ex-gays in my life, and at any rate non that I can say for certain are still in that life. For a few moments in an old Baltimore church late last year, Peterson brought one to life for me. Seeing the excerpts from this work in progress made me hungry to watch the finished piece when it finally arrives.

Well…as it turns out… Marvin has a blog. An audio blog specifically, which is good because you really can’t get to know Marvin without hearing him. You can hear Marvin speak on various topics, and minister to those of us who have been blinded by the god of this world, here, and here, and here, and here. Marvin is a tad opinionated, but unlike some Bush bloggers, he welcomes your comments.

And I’m thinking…it would be nice if some of the other folks in Peterson’s shows would step forward with their own blogs. Chad should have his own audioblog too. Definitely. Oh…and the Minister from Doin’ Time…. Yes. And Tex. Oh foo…just give them all a blog.

And by the way…Peterson has a new schedule of performances up here, so check it out and see if he’s coming to your neighborhood. I’ve promised to write more about what I saw when he came to Baltimore, and I find that some of what I saw moved me so much I’m Still chewing on it. So many shows you go to just leave you the moment you walk out of the theater. Not Peterson’s, I guarantee it.

Via Brad DeLong:

We don't remember too much from four years of high school Latin, but we do recall this phrase: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -- Who will guard the guards themselves? Is there a way to say in Latin, "Who will be an ombudsman for the ombudsman?" Seriously -- to whom does one complain at the Washington Post when the person who is there to receive reader complaints defiantly gets it wrong?

We're referring, of course, to Sunday's piece by the Post's new ombudswoman, Deborah Howell, which ... ended up on a note that read like it was straight from the offices of the Republican National Committee. Here's what she wrote: "The second complaint is from Republicans, who say The Post purposely hasn't nailed any Democrats [in the Abramoff scandal]. Several stories, including one on June 3 by Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, a Post business reporter, have mentioned that a number of Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and Sen. Byron Dorgan (N.D.), have gotten Abramoff campaign money. "So far, Schmidt and Grimaldi say their reporting on the investigations hasn't put Democrats in the first tier of people being investigated. But stay tuned. This story is nowhere near over."

The first assertion is flat-out wrong. Dorgan and Reid could not have received "Abramoff campaign money," because as numerous articles and investigations have shown, Abramoff never donated a dime to any Democrat. Not one. That's not surprising, since Abramoff... is a Republican.

John Aravosis over at AmericaBlog posted a complete list of all the people Abramoff gave money too. There is not a single democrat among them. Not one. Not. One. Yet the Mainstream News Media persists in repeating the republican lie that democrats as well as republicans got money from Abramoff. What is so goddamn hard about telling the truth here?

In other news, via Atrios….

The country was never behind Clinton's impeachment but the media begged for it. The country is much more behind Bush impeachment, but the media is silent.

The Zogby poll referenced by Atrios shows that Americans want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he wiretapped American citizens, by a margin of 52% to 43%. Yet the mainstream news media still regards impeachment as a partisan fringe issue.

Noticing a pattern here yet?

I just do. Some days. Like today. Like right now.

(smile)

Whilst browsing the comments on this post over at Washington Monthly (via a link from Atrios), regarding Bush Administration saber rattling on Iran’s nuclear program, I come across clues that there’s another catch-phrase making the wingnut rounds…

Your BDS is showing. If you don’t like Congress not asserting it’s powers over the President in war-time, elect a Dem majority. Otherwise, please kindly have a nice cup of STFU.

…

When an American city is smoking, radioactive ruin, I will trot out the 100,000 BDS posts from 2003-2006 to show how liberals brought on the appeasement conditions that allowed it to happen. I will prominently display your posts the most and in largest font!

…

1. BDS
2. America-hatred
3. Israel-hatred

Scratch a leftist and you’ll find all three. Rational thought, uh no.

Somebody finally asks…

Is “BDS” some new acronym being traded amongst the semi-literate online wingnuts, these days?

To which our little wingnut responds…

BDS is Bush Derangement Syndrome which 99.999% of liberals suffer from. It’s totally irrational hatred of George W. Bush which clouds all rational thought.

And speaking of rational thought…this is what he posted later. Remember, this is a thread about Bush administration saber rattling over Iran’s nuclear program…

I will agree that trying to impose our values on those religious idiots(Shia and Sunni) in Iraq is not going to work in the short-term. I’m for all out civil war, let a few million be killed and then we’ll side with the winner.

Bush Derangement Syndrome: Characterized by genocidal and sociopathic impulses, gross inability to determine right from wrong or distinguish between true and false. Caused by prolonged uncritical and unconditional support of the Bush Administration…

This week’s cartoon is about Mrs. Scalito’s crying jag for the cameras last Wednesday. Other bloggers have remarked on its patently staged smell, but to get an accurate sense of the moment from our Mainstream News Media you have to read between the lines, as they’re not actually going to say outright what everyone in that hearing room knew…

The most dramatic moment of the day came when the judge’s wife, Martha-Ann Bomgardner, who had been sitting behind him, left the hearing room in tears. She left when Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was apologizing to Alito for his treatment by the opposition. Graham, who was present at a White House preparation session for Alito, mocked Democrats for their relentless questioning about the Princeton group by asking Alito rhetorically if he is "really a closet bigot." After Alito replied that he is "not any kind of a bigot," Graham continued: "Guilt by association is going to drive good men and women away from wanting to sit where you’re sitting…. Judge Alito, I am sorry that you’ve had to go through this. I am sorry that your family has had to sit here and listen to this." After a break, the judge escorted his wife back in. Conservatives seized on the incident to complain about Democratic "bullying," and said they plan to make the incident a cause celebre. "When will the media shame these people for their behavior?" Sean Rushton, executive director of the administration-friendly Committee for Justice, asked in a blast e-mail to journalists. The always-alert Creative Response Concepts, a conservative public relations firm, sent this bulletin: "Former Alito clerk Gary Rubman witnessed Mrs. Alito leaving her husband’s confirmation in tears and is available for interviews, along with other former Alito clerks who know her personally and are very upset about this development." In case that was too much trouble for the journalists, the firm also e-mailed out a statement from the Judicial Confirmation Network calling "for the abuse to stop."

Creative Response Concepts is the right wing media outfit that first began hyping the Swift Boat Veterans. Funny how they had that bulletin about Mrs. Scalito’s tears hitting the fax machines within moments of the event itself. Oh…and they’re available for interviews… Sympathy. You could almost have some for American fascists, when you realize that gestures of sympathy are all they can manage, the real thing being completely incomprehensible to them. When a lawyer for the family of a 10 year old girl who was strip searched without a warrant in a small Pennsylvania coal town in 2003, brought their case before the federal Third Circuit Court, Alito snappishly asked him, "Why do you keep bringing up the fact that this case involves the strip search of a 10-year-old child?" His defenders claim it was about his dedication to applying the law, not sympathy for one small brutalized child. Yes. Just so. The appeal to sympathy pisses them off because it exposes that empty void inside of them, where a human heart would otherwise be. We meet them first in school, then in adult life…the ones that always seem to have a blind spot when it comes to sympathy and compassion. The gentle pull and tug of daily human interaction is a frightening mystery to them. All their lives they take refuge in the structure and form of tradition and religion and law, because without them they’re utterly lost and rudderless in the human community. Over time they may learn how to fake it, but they hate having to do so at a moment’s notice because they have no reflex for it. It’s all an act, and one that as they get older, and achieve some measure of status and power, seems more and more pointless. But it can have it’s uses. Like tears for senators.

The ACLU says that a homophobic pastor’s arrest for propositioning an undercover policeman was probably a violation of his civil rights…

The American Civil Liberties Union says that a pastor who frequently speaks out against homosexuality and was arrested last week for propositioning a male police officer was charged in violation of the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay sex. The Rev. Lonnie Latham, 60, appeared briefly in court on Thursday on charges of lewd conduct, a misdemeanor. Latham was arrested January 3 after allegedly asking an undercover officer to join him in his hotel room for oral sex. Police impounded Latham’s 2005 Mercedes. (story) He was released on a $500 bond. As he was leaving jail he said: “I was set up. I was in the area pastoring to police.”

The ACLU is right of course. The police were conducting a prostitution sting in the area, and the lewd conduct charge was apparently laid on Latham because he never suggested that money change hands. But in that case his arrest can only be for propositioning the cop. That’s speech, and since Lawrence they can’t argue that he was propositioning the cop to commit a crime. This is the second state now that I know of, that seems to be flaunting the Supreme Court decision that overturned the sodomy laws. Virginia being the other. Back in the days after Brown v. Board of Education, some people, including lawmakers in the old Confederacy, were calling for “massive resistance” to racial integration. You can just see something similar brewing over Lawrence. How dare you say we have to treat homosexuals as if they were citizens too… And if president Junior is able to stack the Supreme Court with religious right nutcases like Scalito we may live to see a day when same sex couples are once again made into criminals. The Oklahoma District Attorney seems to think he’s merely being even handed about it…

Oklahoma County District Attorney Wes Lane said Oklahoma law prohibits a person from offering to engage in a lewd act “regardless of whether money is sought for or engaged.” “In this case, that is exactly what Mr. Latham is alleged to have done. To his misfortune, that individual was an Oklahoma City police officer,” Lane said.

…which is another way of saying the law criminalizes a certain kind of speech. But no…this is just a backdoor way of trying to keep people from having sex. I guess the theory is if they can’t ask, they don’t do. Next time you hear one of these rightwing crackpots bellyaching about liberals and nanny government, just laugh in their face.

If you’ve been following the GLBT news outlets lately, you’ve probably noticed that it’s been a particularly violent couple of months for sexual minorities world-wide. And it may have occured to you that violence toward sexual minorities has been getting a bit worse overall lately. It has. And there’s a reason for that.

Gay group wins $87,000 over frivolous suit by Louisiana pastor

MADISON, Wis. Wisconsin’s largest gay rights group has won 87-thousand dollars in legal bills over what a judge called a frivolous lawsuit.

The group Action Wisconsin won the award last week over a suit made by Louisiana pastor Grant Storms.

Storms claimed the group defamed him by saying he advocated the murder of gays at an anti-gay conference in Milwaukee in 2003.

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Patricia McMahon says the group interpreted his remarks reasonably and the lawsuit lacked merit.

…

According to a transcript of his speech, Storm said opponents of gay rights should take to the streets.

Then he mimicked the sound of gunfire, saying, quote, "Boom, boom, boom, boom. There’s twenty! Ca-ching.

There’s two things you need to pay attention to in this story. First, this is a pastor, not merely a man of God, but a Christian inciting people to go out and kill their neighbors. It is more then obscene, it’s the kind of thing that lit the ovens of the Holocaust. But there is more to it. Consider also, that when he got called on it he not only denied what he did, he took his accusers to court for slander. Now…you could just write that off as tactical indignation, but if you’re brave and feel a little like peeking down into the Pit today…google Grant Storms, peruse the record of his words and deeds, and consider that Storms knew exactly what he was doing when he mimicked the sound of gunfire, and that when he took Action Wisconsin to court, he genuinely believed that he had done no such thing. Orwell had a word for it: Doublethink.

Thought marked by the acceptance of gross contradictions and falsehoods, especially when used as a technique of self-indoctrination: "Doublethink…is a vast system of mental cheating (George Orwell).

Definition Via Answers.Com

This is the final step in renouncing your human identity. This is the end of the road. This is the fee prejudice requires. And you pay it up front, and you pay it willingly. Nobody goes into this with their eyes closed. At some point in his life, reality collided with Storms’ cheap conceits and in order for those conceits to win, reality had to loose. But reality never looses. Storms had to walk away from it, and in the end all he could do was walk away from his human identity instead. That’s what hate demands. You have to give it everything, and eventually you become nothing.