Remember this name if you haven’t already heard it: George Allen.  Son of legendary Redskins coach George Allen, one time governor of the state of Virgina, now senator, and all around racist prick.  This is from his Wikipedia entry:

Allen has a long history of interest in the Confederacy although he never lived in the South until he transferred from UCLA to the University of Virginia as a sophomore in college.

The May 8, 2006 [16] and the May 15, 2006 [17]issues of The New Republic reported extensively on Allen’s long association with the Confederate flag. The magazine reported that "[a]ccording to his colleagues, classmates, and published reports, Allen has either displayed the [Confederate] flag–on himself, his car, inside his home–or expressed his enthusiastic approval of the emblem from approximately 1967 to 2000." Allen wore a Confederate flag pin for his high school senior class photo. In high school, college, and law school, Allen adorned his vehicle with a Confederate flag. In college he displayed a Confederate flag in his room. He displayed a Confederate flag in his family’s living room until 1992. In 1993, Allen’s first statewide TV campaign ad for governor included a Confederate flag. In 2000, when a voter told Allen, "Long live the Confederate flag!" Allen replied, "You got it!"

Allen has confirmed that the pin in his high school yearbook was a Confederate flag. Allen has said "it is possible" that he had a Confederate flag on his car in high school. He has not responded to the allegations that he displayed the flag on his pickup truck and in his room in college and law school. In 1993, he confirmed that he had long displayed the Confederate flag in his living room. Greg Stevens, the political consultant who made the 1993 TV ad, confirmed that the ad included a Confederate flag.

I say remember this guy’s name, because from the chattering on the Right I’m hearing, this is the guy the Bush power base Really Likes…the one they’re going to anoint as the next republican candidate for president of the United States.  And here’s what they’ll be sending to the White House if they succeed:

Democrat James Webb’s Senate campaign accused Sen. George Allen (R) of making demeaning comments Friday to a 20-year-old Webb volunteer of Indian descent.

S.R. Sidarth, a senior at the University of Virginia, had been trailing Allen with a video camera to document his travels and speeches for the Webb campaign. During a campaign speech Friday in Breaks, Virginia, near the Kentucky border, Allen singled out Sidarth and called him a word that sounded like "Macaca."

"This fellow here over here with the yellow shirt, Macaca, or whatever his name is. He’s with my opponent. He’s following us around everywhere. And it’s just great. We’re going to places all over Virginia, and he’s having it on film and its great to have you here and you show it to your opponent because he’s never been there and probably will never come."

After telling the crowd that Webb was raising money in California with a "bunch of Hollywood movie moguls," Allen again referenced Sidarth, who was born and raised in Fairfax County.

"Lets give a welcome to Macaca, here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia," said Allen, who then began talking about the "war on terror."

The Webb staffer in question…

Macaca…I hear you asking (assuming you’re as naive about these things as I am)?   Well…Atrios was wondering too…

I was thinking that the assumption that George Felix Allen had been invoking a species of monkey was a bit of a stretch and that he was probably just speaking gibberish for "furrin name." But it is actually an established racial/slur, specifically directed at North Africans. If you search the nastier corners of the internet you’ll find it’s in surprisingly common usage.

Here…from the List Of Ethnic Slurs…

^{Macaque  (Belgium & France) a Negro (originally) or a person of North-African origin (more recently); derived from macaque monkeys}

What you need to notice about this, more then the slur itself, is the arcane nature of the slur.  I’ve heard racist slurs tossed around, sometimes casually and thoughtlessly, and sometimes with bitter venom, probably no more or less then any other average white America male has (and I’m sure a good deal less then the average black American has…).  I was a school kid during the worst of the late 20th century race riots, the great civil rights march on Washington, the killing of Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, the rise and fall of the Black Panthers.  I’ve heard plenty of racist catcalls in my lifetime.  This one was new to me.  But apparently fairly common among the hard core racist set.  That’s what you need to notice.

If you think this will hurt Allen in Virginia, you are sadly mistaken.  If you thought Bush was the bottom of the barrel, think again.  There is no bottom.

In my grade school years I devoured westerns, mostly Louis L’Amour, and science-fiction, mostly hard, mostly Arthur C. Clarke, Hal Clement style stuff, but also Ray Bradbury’s poetic mindbenders, and E.E. Smith’s space operas and James Blish’s Star Trek novelizations.  Once upon a time I adored Larry Niven’s "Known Space" tales.  Then I read an interview with him in Future Life magazine (back in the 70s), where he averred in response to a question about gay rights, that giving homosexuals what they wanted would be a good way of breeding them out of the population (I’ve always wondered what Kerry O’Quinn, the publisher, thought when he read that).  That was when I began to realize that science fiction folk weren’t necessarily a very broad minded lot. 

Year later I’d run into the same set of knuckle dragging prejudices among fantasy world fans and authors.  I and a few other readers had an online…er…disagreement…with Richard Pini, co-author of the Elfquest series of comics, about the absence of gay elves in the storyline.  Understand that by that time it had been very, Very well established that the Pini’s elves were a thoroughly uninhibited lot (the orgy scene in EQ 17 comes to mind…).   It has always struck me as downright bizarre that Richard and Wendy Pini could write a storyline that had as its major plot device, the mating of a female elf with wolves in order to produce a race of elves better adapted to their world, and yet be so goddamned squeamish about the idea of same sex elven lovers.

But people Do learn and grow.  A younger Wil Wheaton once mouthed off crap about gays in Star Trek that an older Wil Wheaton would later regret and apologize for.  In fact, Wheaton later did volunteer work against a California referendum against same sex marriage because it so outraged him (that, and the fact that he’s a fellow geek, is why he’s on my blog roll). 

But you still see an amazing amount of anti-gay crap in science-fiction and fantasy fandom and it’s a big reason why, much as I still like the genres, I keep the scene at arm’s length.  I was doing a little research the other day, and came across some reader reviews of Red King, one of the latest in the Star Trek franchise novels.  Apparently one or more characters in it (I haven’t read it) are gay.  This causes some concern to one reader…

Too much diversity!

Star Trek novels are known for introducing a variety of different species, cultures, and religions, but this series bombards the reader with so many at once that the storyline becomes muddled and one is left begging for a glossary. I hope that the third book, written by a different author, will narrow its focus somewhat.

I don’t take issue with the authors for including a gay character in the books. It makes sense, with that many different species, that someone would be. What I find annoying is that they focus so much time on him and seem to feel the need to have one of the other characters either make a pass at him or give him that "knowing look" in each one of the books. He’s gay, I get it! Get on with the the exploration and adventure!

…and outrage by another. 

Gay, Gay, Gay. Enough Already

Gene Roddenberry creator of Star Trek established via interviews and convention appearances that he felt that homosexuality was a desease that would no longer exist in the 23rd century. It is a slap in the face to his vision and his ideas to fill his universe with gay characters when it is so against what Star Trek stood for (social illnesses being done away with). I could tolerate this inclusion in the story if the writers, one of which is gay, hadn’t tried to shovel it down my throught every time I came across one of their gay characters. I can only hope that these characters will be pushed back or their preferences buried in the next installment in the series now that they are no longer being written by the two that penned this book. Not Recommended unless you are into the gay scene

As I said, I haven’t read the book, but I strongly doubt that Paramount would let pornography be published under their own imprint.  So probably the only thing on display in that book would have been another character little different from any of the other Trek characters save that they mate to their own sex.  As opposed to…I dunno…a wolf or something.  Yet that’s all it takes for some folks to start bellyaching about gay being shoved down their throats.  Well…let it be said that not everyone agreed…

…dumb a*s! Gene Roddenberry never said that he thought homosexuality is a disease. Get your sh*t right! Stupid people like this are what make Star Trek’s future look so promising. Because people like L. Redman won’t be around. People like him with his type of belief will be long extinct. Dumb Sh*t! If you like Star Trek read the book. It’s good.

Gene Roddenberry did announce shortly before his death, that Star Trek: The Next Generation would begin featuring gay characters on a regular basis.  But after he died, that promise was quickly trashcanned by Paramount.  In fact to this day the Trek universe has no regular gay characters in it.  I don’t think it’s because the executives at Paramount share the views of the reader above, who said that homosexuality is a disease that will be cured by the 24th century, but it might as well be.  Roddenberry understood that stories about the future, are really stories about who we are now.  And who we are now is Brokeback Mountain couldn’t win best picture, because John Wayne was rolling over in his grave.

[Update…] I found this link to a good article on AfterElton.Com about the issue of Gays in Trek…

“Just to get Star Trek on TV was an astounding move,” George Takei–the openly gay actor who starred as Star Trek’s Mr. Sulu–says in an interview with AfterElton. “The program execs were baffled. They did not know what to do with it! Now, we are in the 21st century, and this is speculation, but I really think that if Gene were still with us today, he would have been equally bold for our times today and addressed the issue of equality for gays, lesbians, transgenders and bisexuals.”

So, why hasn’t Star Trek entered this final frontier?

Many blame Rick Berman, Star Trek’s longtime executive producer. While Berman has never publicly said he has no plans in the long-term for gay characters on the show, many fans have read cryptic messages into some things he has mentioned over the years. In a 2002 interview with USAToday.com, Berman addresses the subject matter.

“That was really the wishful thinking of some people who were constantly at us,” Berman states. “But we don’t see heterosexual couples holding hands on the show, so it would be somewhat dishonest of us to see two gay men or lesbians holding hands.”

But in Star Trek: Insurrection, Commander Riker (Jonathan Frakes) and Counselor Troi (Marina Sirtis) are seen holding hands at the end of the movie. Indeed, Star Trek has often shown characters kissing and embracing. And fans have desired more than just handholding, hoping instead for a well-rounded character with as many virtues and flaws as their heterosexual counterparts.

In an exclusive interview with AfterElton, Andy Mangels–Trek’s only openly gay writer, having written over a dozen Star Trek themed novels–says he believes blame lies with Berman. “I have never met Rick Berman, and he has never expressed any specific attitudes directly to me. That said, not one single actor, staff member, or Paramount employee has ever once defended him from charges of homophobia, and many have accused him of it.

"Berman was ultimately responsible for killing almost every pitch for gay characters, and in interviews, was mealy-mouthed and waffling about the need for GLB T representation. At the very least, he was gutless and didn’t care about GLBT representation. From the information and evidence I’ve seen, heard, and read, I believe that Berman is the reason we never saw gays on Star Trek I shed no tears that he’s gone, except that he did his best to ruin the franchise on his way out.”

Go read the rest…it’s a really interesting read.  

For all the digs and jokes about MySpace, I’m finding it a cheerful place to meet people and chat about this and that.  That’s more then I expected when I joined, which btw was only so I could communicate with other people in the center of the Love In Action protests back in the summer of 2005.  A fun MySpace thing are the random surveys and questions people exchange with others on their friends list, via ‘bulletins’.  One came my way a few days ago, a dare of sorts, and reticent little dweeb that I still am inside, I decided to risk it myself:

ONE QUESTION

You get to ask me 1 Question (TO MY INBOX)…any one question, no matter how crazy it is, and I promise to answer it truthfully…the catch is…you have to repost this and see what people ask you….so go for it…

I got a few bites, some of which really made me think.  One asked me how I would compare my hopes and fears about my future and the future of my country now, as compared to when I was 21.  Considering that I turned 21 within a few weeks after Nixon resigned, the question really floored me: the more I thought about it, the more I realized how vastly different America is now, from what it was then, and how far down the right wing has dragged us since those days, since Reagan.  I’m still pondering my answer to him, but it’s really hard to look at how much damage has been done.

Another one came the other day asking me what my proof of the existence of God is.  In another survey I’d joked that beautiful guys were my proof that there is a God.  My questioner, an atheist, wanted a bit more detail.

The question managed to open the door a tad to that place inside of me where I talk to God; where I’m still a six year old boy, laying on his back on a warm summer night, looking up at the stars and wondering what they are.  I thought I’d share my answer.  The country is in a grip of fundamentalist hysteria, the central conceit of which is that those of us who aren’t "bible believing Christians" have no faith, no spirituality, no reverence, no sense of awe and rapture, no morals, no values higher then the pleasure of the moment.  We’re all just skating by, just cheating our way through life.  But it is not those of us who are willing stand before the creation, before the great work of nature, just as we are, and let it speak for itself, who are the cheats. 

No…that was just me being ironic. You hear heterosexual guys saying the same thing about beautiful women being their proof that there is a god.

Until you get to the point that you can even say you understand how the universe was created in the first place, I really don’t think you can claim you have a proof that there is a creator. My thoughts about God are mostly along the lines of Frank Lloyd Wright, when he said "I believe in God but I spell it Nature." I don’t look to the bible or any sort of holy writ, other then the natural world, which I take to be the firsthand testament of the creator itself. When the bird and the bird book disagree, believe the bird. But I admit the natural world reveals no objective evidence of a creator. And that doesn’t really surprise or distress me. I am fine with that and not really interested in whether others share my spiritual beliefs or not. Just that we’re all free to live by our conscience in these matters. I care very much about that.

I feel a great spiritual exaltation whenever I contemplate the fundamentals of physics and nature, and a deep spiritual gratitude toward whatever it was that created this amazing and beautiful universe, and whether or not it amounts to any sort of consciousness, or anything a human mind could grasp as being an consciousness, is not a question I can answer, or worry about all that much. I ponder it often but I don’t worry about it. I have no proof to offer you or anyone else, nor any doctrine nor creed nor theology to impart, other then don’t stop asking questions, and don’t be afraid to discard answers that don’t work anymore. The tree that stops growing is dead.

And…Your Mileage May Vary.

-Bruce 

I am blessed with a body that reacts…strongly…to mood altering drugs of any sort.  Alcohol, marijuana, whatever.  It never took much to get me blasted as a teen, and beings as I was usually zonked pretty quickly, I never really had more fun if I did more…just pass out.  I’m convinced this is why I never fell into any cycle of addiction and recovery.  It certainly kept me from becoming addicted to cigarettes.

I still vividly remember my first toke on a cigarette.  I was 11 or 12, and one day my friends and I found an unopened pack of Winstons in a construction site near our apartments.  We took it to our private hang out and passed them around.  That first puff was my last.  It felt like my entire body was under attack.  My lungs burned, my skin chilled, my head started to go Right Up Into The Stratosphere.  I was hacking and coughing all over the place and for once my friends weren’t making fun of me for not being cool because they were all doing it too.  For years after that I wondered why the hell adults smoked.  And then I became one.

I smoke the occasional cigar now.  It’s a gentler, more mellow nicotine buzz, and I don’t have to drag the smoke into my lungs to get it.  And I can tell you exactly why I do it.  Stress.  Work deadline stress mostly, but also the stress of my life at times.  I’m single, and when you’re single you don’t get the chance to have those heart to heart talks about life with someone you trust intimately.  So I paint, I draw, I blog, and I go for solitary walks, sometimes with a cigar in hand, just trying to mellow out.  And like those other highs it doesn’t take much, and that keeps my tobacco usage down.  But I’m aware of the dangers, and when I walk past the Baltimore Gay Community Center sometimes, and I see a bunch of gay kids hanging out, and at least half of them are smoking, I get angry.  Not at them, but at the stresses in their lives.  It doesn’t take much to figure why you see more gay then straight teens smoking. 

Not much that is, if you have half a brain and a functional conscience.  Which brings me to the post I saw the other day on Stacy Harp’s blog.  You’ll recall Stacy as the anti-gay activist who just the other week was pushing Guy Adams’ claims that raping babies is the newest trend among gays.  But, baby sodomizers though we are, Stacy still cares about our health.  Really.  Stacy thinks the gay community should sue the tobacco industry.

…according to The San Francisco Chronicle the gay community has a higher rate of smoking than the heterosexual community.  That shouldn’t surprise anyone, because according to the article gays smoke because of stress, they go to bars (DUH) and the advertisers are victimizing the gay community because they are intentionally targeting the gay community because they know they are stressed out more than any other community.

So much, so obvious.  For instance, you’d be kinda stressed too if you had crackpots going around telling your neighbors that you were a having sex with infants because you thought it was trendy.  But…no.   The problem with linking higher incidence of smoking (and overall drug abuse) among gay people with stress is that’s a finger pointing right back at the likes of…er…Stacy.  And the finger must always point to homosexuals.  Whatever happens to gay people, whether it’s drug abuse, suicide or violence, it must always be their own fault.  Their blood is upon them…

But this is interesting, according to the article…

Gay smokers have their own theories on why they smoke: the club and bar scene, trouble finding dates and falling in love, high alcohol- and drug-abuse rates in the community. Sometimes, smoking is related to a lack of family connections, which can cause stress and also remove pressure to stop smoking once someone has started.

and this….

"Gay people probably smoke longer because we’re not as family- oriented. If you don’t have kids and raise a family, you don’t need to stop," said John Daly, 41, who has smoked for 25 years. "We don’t have the same responsibilities. We can be reckless a little longer."

OH…okay…so now we know why the gay community smokes so much, and here I thought that we are being told constantly by the gay community activists that their lives are just like the normal heterosexual’s life.  And yet, in the gays own words they admit that they use stink sticks because they are not as "family oriented", "don’t have kids or raise a family" and "can be reckless", as well as are "drug users" and "alcohol abusers".

Right.  Our lives are just like the normal heterosexual’s life, if normal heterosexuals had multi-million dollar political hate machines working hard year after year to deny them the right to marry, the right to raise children, the right to so much as be with their spouse in an emergency room.  Our lives are just like the normal life of heterosexuals who have to live under the cloud of one relentless propaganda campaign after another, telling their parents, their siblings, their co-workers, their neighbors that, for example, they’re all busy raping babies.  Our lives are just like that of any other heterosexuals who have to listen to the sound of pulpits thumping from one end of the country to the other about how they’re going to burn in hell because god hates them, god condemns them, and everyone else should too.  That kind of normal heterosexual family life.

Stacy thinks we ought to be outraged. 

As for me, I’m not going to hold my breath (unless some stinky smoker is around) waiting for the gay community to go after the tobacco companies… or the bars or alcohol companies. But if I was gay, I’d sure as heck be very mad that these companies are targeting my community and hoping to snag my community with deadly substances that could kill my community off quicker than if we didn’t all drink and smoke.

Hmmm.  Double standard…it’s okay for the tobacco and alcohol communties to push a deadly substance on the gay community, and no outrage.  But when someone who is trying to help the gay community tells them they should stop having sex, especially sex with someone who has HIV, you get persecuted.

Not to mention being persecuted just for politely telling us not to have sex with babies please.  Yes…we’re a cranky lot.

And in fact, a casual google search turns up numerous examples of just how cranky – some of us are – about the dangers of smoking, – second hand smoke, and actvisim against smoking in our community (pdf).  But to actually dig up that kind of information, you’d first have to want to…you know…know. 

I’ve bitched about it myself a time or two…

That last one being in reaction to a news article I came across in July of 2004, about a Utah anti smoking campaign directed a gay youth that lost its funding because…well…it was directed at gay youth…

For eight months, the "Queers Kick Ash" campaign hummed along, spreading its anti-tobacco message to Utah’s gay and lesbian community with help from a state grant.
During that time, records show the Utah Department of Health routinely approved and funded promotional materials – posters, banners, T-shirts, newspaper ads, even a Web site – for the campaign by the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Community Center of Utah. Then, in mid-May, several students were disciplined at Hillcrest High for wearing "Queers Kick Ash" T-shirts.

A few weeks later, the Health Department yanked the funding – an expected $200,000 over the next two years – and the anti-tobacco campaign fizzled. Ever since then, the community center has wondered why it lost the funding.

"We’ve made phone calls, mailed letters and sent faxes – and nothing," said Tami Marquardt, the center’s acting executive director. "They haven’t had the courtesy or the public decency to give us an answer. I don’t know why they won’t talk to anyone if this is all aboveboard. This is nothing but a homophobic cover-up. It’s discrimination, pure and simple."

For its part, the Health Department – in a June 1 letter from Heather Borski, manager of the department’s Tobacco Prevention and Control Program – maintains that it opted not to renew the center’s grant to "prevent the anti-tobacco health message from being overshadowed by unrelated advocacy activity."

Richard Milton, the department’s deputy director, and two department spokeswomen would not define "unrelated advocacy activity."

"Our statement speaks for itself," Milton said Friday. "It’s a question of interpretation."

Let me hazard an interpretation: You can’t target gay youth with an anti-smoking message directed specifically to them, because that might lead them to think we actually care what the fuck happens to the little faggots.

Well if I was Stacy Harp I’d be outraged that the state of Utah withdrew funding for an anti-smoking program that targeted gay youth.  Wait…no.  If I was Stacy Harp I’d have probably taken up smoking years ago, due to the constant stress of trying not to see a gutter crawling bigot every time I looked in a mirror.

[Edited a tad…] 

Excuse me, while I look down into the Pit for a little while… 

What kind of adult takes a good kid, who doesn’t do drugs, behaves decently to other people, and works hard enough in school that they make the honor roll one goddamn year after another after another after another, and tries to make them feel insecure and worthless inside? 

.

.

.

.

(sigh)

Okay…back to my weekend chores… 

I was reading the entry on the 2006 NC Gay and Lesbian Film Fest over at Pam’s House Blend, and this bit about the indy documentary, small town gay bar, caught my eye…

We saw small town gay bar, a documentary by Malcolm Ingram (it was exec produced by Kevin Smith, yes, the director of Clerks). It was a wonderful look at what social life is like for gays in the rural South. I mean really rural — the two Mississippi bars profiled were in Shannon (pop. 1,657) and Meridian (39,968). Durham, for comparison’s sake has an estimated pop. of 204,845.

Watching this film is like going back in time if you live in a progressive area or large city; the closet is a necessity here, as you might imagine. Being out can be a death sentence for these people. The bar is their only refuge, their only time to let their hair down, be themselves and feel safe to be who they are, as gays, lesbians, trans, black, white — all that matters is that you know you aren’t alone. Drag queens had a home to perform out and proud at Rumors and Crossroads (now called Different Seasons).

The audience howled as Ingram interviewed the unhinged Rotting Cryptkeeper^TM Fred Phelps. Fred was his animated self, talking about "fanning the flames of fag lust" and it was clear he’s energized and surprised by "all the fags that come out to protest him."

The Phelps Klan picketed the funeral of Scotty Joe Weaver, who was killed right next door in Alabama. The 18-year-old out gay teen, known to many at the Mississippi bars, was murdered by a trio of backwoods homobigots; he was tied to a chair in his trailer, beaten, stabbed, and partially decapitated. His body was dumped in the woods and then set on fire. No wonder these people remain closeted.

And since this is Mississippi, Ingram had to stop by the HQ and nexus of homohate, Don and Tim Wildmon’s American Family Association, which is in Tupelo. Tim sat on camera and dutifully told the story about how it was a good thing for the community to have his local minions stand on a nearby bridge and take down the tag numbers of people who were going over the bridge to go to the gay bar.

The next day on his radio show, Don would read the tag numbers on the air. This, he said, "would keep people accountable."…

Right.  Like Christopher Gaines, Nichole Kelsay and Robert Porter held Scotty Joe Weaver accountable.  Love the sinner, hate the sin, tie the sinner to a chair, torture them to death and then burn their body.

Don’t you just hate it when your home and gardening newsletter starts gay bashing…

This is not your typical newsletter from Outsidepride.com, Inc. In fact, this is the first one in six years which is not business related. I apologize for cluttering your inbox with an unsolicited email; however you are free to unsubscribe just by clicking the link at the bottom.

I want to share with you my television viewing experience the other night on prime time television. I ask those of you who agree with me to go to www.cbs.com and go to the bottom of the page, click the feedback link and express your opinion. I know the vast majority of you will agree with me as all polls indicate. We are the majority, not the minority as the liberal media would lead you to believe.

My wife and I sat down to watch television the other night with our children. Cold Case was on which is normally a fairly enjoyable show to watch; however, the last half hour of the show dealt with a young man who wished he had asked his male friend to come with him (long story short). The show ended with the two men hugging and obvious intimation they had discovered their gay feelings towards each other. The very next show was Without A Trace. The whole last half hour of this show was about two lesbians who were struggling with their feelings of lesbianism. It ended with full acceptance from one father and the two lesbians making out. Yes, they were kissing right at the end of the show on public prime time television. So much for wholesome family television.

Now, I am NOT trying to bash homosexuals and I am not a bigot; however, I feel homosexuality is morally wrong and should not be "promoted" as what is the norm for society. Text books are being rewritten as I am writing this to "highlight" every homosexual who has made a contribution to society. There are teachers who have been asked to make sure students know that, "This person in history was a homosexual." History is being rewritten to promote homosexuality and prime time television is doing its best to make homosexuality a "normal" behavior. If homosexuality was the norm, civilization would have ceased to exist thousands of years ago. Procreation takes a man and a woman. There was Adam and then there was Eve, not Adam and Steve.

There are literally tens of thousand of you reading this email right now. If you are tired of the way public television is going let CBS know! It will only take about 1 minute of your time. Again, just go to www.cbs.com and click the feedback link at the bottom. It is time the majority speak up and not let the minority run this country. The majority can bring back the Christian heritage this country was founded on because it is, "In God We Trust."

Thank you for your time,

Troy Hake
President
Outsidepride.com, Inc.

No Troy…you’re not a bigot.  You just assume that everyone who does business with you is heterosexual but you’re not a bigot.  You just want gay people to live their lives in the closet safely out of the sight of normal people because even the simplest gesture of love and affection between them are "gay feelings" and not simply the feelings all human beings feel towards the ones they love, and you’re not a bigot.  And those "gay feelings" are immoral whether or not they lift and sustain the lives of gay people in exactly the same ways that feelings of love and affection otherwise lift and sustain the lives of heterosexuals, and you’re not a bigot.  And a kiss between two heterosexuals who love each other is wholesome but a kiss between a same sex couple who love each other just as much is not because that isn’t love it’s "gay feelings" and you’re not a bigot.  And there are no gay kids in schools anywhere because no homosexual was ever a kid once who had to endure a relentless torrent of bullying and messages of disgust and loathing and shame and you’re not a bigot.  And schools shouldn’t teach kids a few honest facts about homosexuality because schools exist only to enforce the worldview of you and your religion and you’re not a bigot.  And anyone who doesn’t agree with you isn’t a Christian like you are and you’re not a bigot.  Well…actually you are Troy.

What the fuck…you run a lawn and garden business and you don’t think you have any gay customers?  You didn’t think you had any heterosexual customers with gay kids…or gay siblings…or gay friends?  You just thought that spitting in your customer’s faces was a great way to do business?  No…you’re a bigot, and bigots just can’t keep their goddamned knees from jerking can they Troy?  Hey…you unwholesome destroyer of civilization…wanna buy some garden soil from me?  I am not a bigot. 

The only thing more idiotic might be running an upscale hotel business while bellyaching about how "absolutely ridiculous" giving gay people equal housing protection is…

Support for a fair-housing ordinance that prohibits discrimination against gays and lesbians has cost Orange County [Florida] Mayor Rich Crotty the support of his biggest re-election backer.

The county Commission voted unanimously last month to expand the existing law to include gays. (story)

Last week Tom Hutchison, the chief executive officer of CNL Hotels & Resorts Inc., informed Crotty that he would have nothing more to do with the mayor’s re-election campaign.  He had been a key fundraiser and had served on the campaign steering committee.

In an email to Crotty, Hutchinson attributed his decision to Crotty’s "favoring the absolutely ridiculous vote on legal protection for equal housing for gays."

"I am not interested in supporting candidates with seemingly zero Christian biblical principals on the issues regarding the alternative gay lifestyle," the email said.

After the email to the mayor became public CNL quickly disassociated itself from Hutchinson’s statements, saying he was speaking as a citizen and his views did not reflect those of the company.

Whoops!  Kindly disregard that raving lunatic who happens to be our CEO…

Hutchinson also issued a public statement to the Orlando Sentinal which the paper noted appeared at odds with the email he sent to the mayor

"I do not believe in discrimination of any kind, for any reason – period," it said. "I am thankful that this is a community that embraces the individual views of all its citizens."

I don’t believe in discrimination of any kind, I just support discrimination of some kinds.  And if you oppose the discrimination of any kind that I don’t believe in I will withdraw my support for you.  And please don’t hold me accountable for the discrimination I support, but don’t believe in.

[Edited a tad…] 

Ah yes…  The old raving lunatic in a wheelchair gimmick…

Lay aside, for the purposes of this argument, the destruction this war has delivered to Lebanon. Krauthammer has never in his career expressed a word of sympathy for an Arab, anywhere. He hates them all. For him, the only good part of this war is the damage done to Lebanon.

But here’s the beauty part. Krauthammer doesn’t care about the Jews either. He wants a ground war and if it kills 500 Israeli soldier boys, so be it. Can you imagine. Usually, you can count on Krauthammer to weigh in about Jewish losses at every opportunity. In fact, the mean-spirited Krauthammer only cares about Jews. Or so I thought.

Actually I should have known better. About three years ago, I saw Krauthammer flip out in synagogue on Yom Kippur. The rabbi had offered some timid endorsement of peace — peace essentially on Israel’s terms — but peace anyway. Krauthammer went nuts. He actually started bellowing at the rabbi, from his wheel chair in the aisle. People tried to "shush" him. It was, after all, the holiest day of the year. But Krauthammer kept howling until the rabbi apologized. The man is as arrogant as he is thuggish. Who screams at the rabbi at services? For advocating peace?

So I was wrong about Krauthammer. He doesn’t give a damn about Israel…

I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens…

You know…these people really have no business posing as the protectors of children…

Just remember who bellyaches the loudest whenever schools consider anti-bullying measures to protect gay school kids from abuse.  If the day ever comes that we manage to convince these louts that sexual orientation is something determined before birth, you best believe that when a toddler is sexually abused and it turns out the kid has a homosexual biology, every talk radio jackass on the dial will be yapping to the mob that the kid probably bought it on themselves.  That was their first reaction to Matthew Shepard’s murder wasn’t it.

I’ve been meaning to correct a reference in my Coming Out Story to an old rock poster that caught my adolescent eye back in the 70s and finally got around to it now.  The reference comes in episode two, where I defensively tell my libido that I once stared at a poster of Vanessa Williams for an hour.  Several readers have pointed out to me that it would have been impossible for the model in that poster to have been Vanessa Williams back in 1971.  Yeah.  It was Vanessa Redgrave.  Here it is btw…

…and I’ll tell you what: Even knowing now that the model is a woman, I would still hang this poster on my wall in a heartbeat if I had one, because with very little effort I can still see a goddamn foxy guy in it.  Sorry Vanessa.  Really.  My head just works like that. 

I swear I researched this and yet I Still mucked up the name when I was doing the captions in that cartoon.  If that really had been a guy in that poster I’d sure as hell have gotten his name right. 

The antigay junk science of the religious right often strikes me like a bunch of drunks in a bar trying to see who can out bullshit everyone.  I’m telling you guys, homos are all pedophiles.  The average homo has sex with a thousand underage kids in his lifetime…did I say a thousand?  I meant ten thousand.  In a day.  During their lunch break.  That’s why they’re all school teachers.  I’m telling you.  Where’s my drink?  The whole entire fucking NEA is a bunch of liberal homos.  And they’re communists too.  Communist Islamic terrorists.  They want to teach six year olds how to use dildos.  No shit…I did a study that proves it.  They should pass an amendment closing all the public schools and making home schooling mandatory for everyone.  Last year the NEA passed out a million dildos to elementary school kids.  It’s true.  And they panted them to look like candy canes.  FOX news did a story on it…

One of these days, I figured, they’d start yapping that we’re having sex with infants too.  Well…guess what…

An organizer for the conservative Renew America is under fire for linking homosexuality with infant pedophilia.

"The newest thing in Chicago, it’s becoming a trend, and you’re gonna find this hard to believe…sex with infants," Guy Adams told an Internet radio show hosted by fellow conservative Stacy L. Harp.

Adams (pictured) offered no evidence to back up his claims of infant pedophilia.

He appeared on Harp’s program on Wednesday to discuss the recent Gay Games in Chicago and embarked on a nearly 30 minute conversation with Harp to attack gays.

"It’s not enough that they have…you know when you engage in perversion, and homosexuality is perversion, we don’t hate the gays mind you, we don’t hate them, we hate what they’re doing…pretty soon that perversion is like addiction, it’s not enough, so you need to graduate to something else. You need to move on. So now they’re having sex with animals, a small group that’s getting bigger, sex with infants, sex in the street in Chicago out in the open, it’s just getting more and more perverted."

Adams dismissed the contributions of GLBT people to society by saying, "what contributions, AIDS, pornography?" 

He also referred to gay people as "a very angry and violent group when confronted with the truth."

Angry and violent are we?  Well here’s how Adams responded to blogger Joe Brummer, after Brummer demanded an apology.

—– Original Message —–

From "Guy Adams" <GuyAdams@RenewAmerica.us>
To "Joe Brummer" <joebrummer@joebrummer.com>
Cc <stacyharp@gmail.com>
Sent Friday, August 04, 2006 216 AM
Subject Reply From Joe
    

What’s your point Joe?  It sex with babies the truth; it IS happening, so what’s your point?

Let’s just assume that gays are not screwing babies. Okay then, what ARE gays doing? Can you describe it for me and the public???

If you won’t describe it, then I will. Openly and in a national forum.

One thing you will quickly discover about me — I CANNOT be intimidated nor will I retreat.  I will stand my ground no matter what.

YOU brought this war to me and I will finish it.  And there are many, many more like me too.

We simply don’t care about you petty proclamations, not does Alan.

You woke up the wrong guy.

~Guy
    

 —– Original Message —–

From "Guy Adams" <GuyAdams@RenewAmerica.us>
To <joebrummer@joebrummer.com>
Cc <stacyharp@gmail.com>
Sent Friday, August 04, 2006 329 AM
Subject Re From Joe

Dear Joe,

You are intentionally deceived.

Whether I reach gays or not is not that important to me. Yes, I hope that God is able to reach them, but at the end of the day, I have been placed at war with your likes, and that was YOUR choice.

In other words, I declare war against you and your kind.

I did not desire this war, but you thrust it upon us. It was your call.

Having said that, I say to you (now more than ever) that I am singularly determined to see your agenda defeated, and it will be.

Not that I am perfect — far from it, but your behavior is explicitly labeled by God as an "abomination".  T\here’s no getting around that judgment.

Say what you will and argue as you must, but at the end of the day, God declares your behavior as totally unacceptable to Him.

God will not change His position on that, as He has clearly stated, Jesus is the same today, yesterday and tomorrow.

He will never affirm homosexuality.

Nor will I.

~Guy

On Thu, August 3, 2006 856, joebrummer@joebrummer.com said

> Dear Guy,
> Sorry you feel that way.   While your busy trying to get God to call me,
> you are also out in the public eye making outlandish and false claims
> about gays and lesbians.    Injustice like that needs to be brought to the
> light of the public eye, or as I commonly say, the sunlight of justice.
> I cannot change your mind about gays and lesbians, although I can
> certainly say I have never had sex with animals or infants.   Your claims
> are disgusting and your message is evil.   Talk about bearing false
> witness.
> You will never reach gays and lesbians with these immoral acts.  Your
> approach is awful.   Sadly you discredit anything truthful you could say
> with the utterly outrageous claims like this.     Stacy informs me that
> part 2 of the show is worse and that your claims there are eve more
> outrageous.
> Your mentality is nothing more than a call to arms that some sick minds
> will be happy to take.  Over the past six weeks there have been some
> violent attacks on gays and lesbians espcially in San Diego.    Where do
> you think people get this notion tht they need to "get the homos"?   Is it
> perhaps your false messages about gays being after children?    Is it your
> false notion we are the biggest danger since the civil war?
> Your message is wrong and it will be paid for in the blood of GLBT people.
>    Perhaps you should think before you speak.  If you think you are doing
> god’s works, you are sadly mistaken.    God would have no part in putting
> his children in danger they way you have done.
> Joe

On Thu Aug 3 1:19 , ‘Guy Adams’  sent

Joe,

Initially, I had a great sense of compassion for you and I hoped that God would be able to reach you.

But after your actions in shutting me down on your blog, and esp after reading your recent pleas to Stacy, I am of the persuasion that you are what God calls a "reprobate", beyond His willingness to save.

Over and out,

~Guy
    
~Guy Adams

Deputy National Grassroots Director
(Alan Keyes’ RenewAmerica)
    
Email GuyAdams@RenewAmerica.us

    

—– Original Message —–

From "Guy Adams" <GuyAdams@RenewAmerica.us>
To "Joe Brummer" <joebrummer@joebrummer.com>
Sent Friday, August 04, 2006 257 AM
Subject Re From Joe / you lose.

You and your remarks are inconsequential.

At the end of the day, you lose.

~TGuy
    

—– Original Message —–

From "Guy Adams" <GuyAdams@RenewAmerica.us>
To "Joe Brummer" <joebrummer@joebrummer.com>
Cc <stacyharp@gmail.com>
Sent Friday, August 04, 2006 222 AM
Subject Re From Joe
    

Your comments are not even worth me read. I’ll bypass.  WHO ARE YOU? WHAT’S YOUR NAME?

In the course of a few short months, no one will want to mention your name out of sheer fear.

You CANNOT tear my words apart because you are speaking from the moral low ground and because my words spoke the truth.

In other words, you have no firm ground on which to stand. You are a coward. I initially had a heart for you but you have proven yourself to be a reprobate.

The war is on.  As Reagan said: We win, you lose.

Understand that quite well, because in a true war (unlike Iraq), all means available to me will be used.

You targeted the wrong guy, but I thank God that you did.

Enjoy your brief stay in the spotlight.

Nice guy.  Calm.  Reasoned.  Compassionate.  Loving the sinner, while hating the sin.  Uhm….not.  There’s more on Joe Brummer’s site.

There it is.  There is the hot burning core of hate not far beneath all that pious rhetoric about loving the sinner, and hating the sin.  And that kind of thing, I want to emphasize, is nothing new.  Over and over I saw words just like those on Usenet, back as far as 1993.  Paranoid…threatening…hysterical…and not just from the usual gutter trash, but from…well…otherwise fine and upstanding pillars of the community.  People just like Mr. Guy Adams, who, as it turns out, not only works for Renew America, but also is, or was as of January 2005, a Deputy Sheriff in Cook County Illinois.

(Thanks to Pam’s House Blend for the catch) I’m sure he treats the gay and lesbian citizens of Cook County he encounters during the course of his work with dignity and respect.  Well…actually I’m not.

More on this on the Cartoon Page tomorrow…

Things aren’t so bad in the Middle East.  Really.  In fact, they’re going swimmingly.  If you believe the world is going to end soon anyway that is…

President Bush often complains about lack of transparency in places like North Korea or, more recently, Cuba — and contrasts that with the United States.

Here he is in Vienna in June: "We’re a transparent democracy. People know exactly what’s on our mind. We debate things in the open. We’ve got a legislative process that’s active."

But the reality is that, particularly when it comes to Bush’s foreign policy, the minimal press access to the intensely secret inner workings of the White House and the almost complete lack of effective Congressional oversight have left Bush’s decision-making process largely a mystery.

Case in point: What is really motivating our policy in the Middle East? And who’s really making the decisions? We don’t know.

…

Today, Ron Hutcheson of McClatchy Newspapers writes: "If there’s a starting point for George W. Bush’s attachment to Israel, it’s the day in late 1998 when he stood on the hilltop where Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount, and, eyes brimming with tears, read aloud from his favorite hymn, ‘Amazing Grace.’

" ‘He was very emotional. It was a tear-filled experience,’ said Matthew Brooks, a prominent Jewish Republican who escorted Bush, then governor of Texas, and three other GOP governors on the Middle East visit. ‘He brought Israel back home with him in his heart. I think he came away profoundly moved.’

"Eight years later, Bush is living up to his reputation as the most pro-Israel president ever. As Israel’s military action in Lebanon heads into its fourth week, the president is standing firm against growing international pressure for an immediate cease-fire."

Yesterday, I noted former Newsday and Knight Ridder White House correspondent Saul Friedman ‘s essay on NiemanWatchdog.org: "I believe this to be the first time in modern American history that a president’s religion, in this case his Christian fundamentalism, has become a decisive factor in his foreign and domestic policies. It’s a factor that has been under-reported, to say the least, and that begs for press attention."

Former Clinton official Sidney Blumenthal sees another, related form of evangelism at work: The neoconservative variety. He writes in Salon: "By secretly providing NSA intelligence to Israel and undermining the hapless Condi Rice, hardliners in the Bush administration are trying to widen the Middle East conflict to Iran and Syria, not stop it. . . .

"The neoconservatives are described as enthusiastic about the possibility of using NSA intelligence as a lever to widen the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and Israel and Hamas into a four-front war."

…

And here’s another data point: Joel C. Rosenberg, who writes Christian apocalyptic fiction, told me in an interview this week that he was invited to a White House Bible study group last year to talk about current events and biblical prophecy.

Rosenberg said that on February 10, 2005, he came to speak to a "couple dozen" White House aides in the Old Executive Office Building — and has stayed in touch with several of them since.

Rosenberg wouldn’t say exactly what was discussed. "The meeting itself was off the record, as you could imagine," he said. He declined to name the staffer he said invited him or describe the attendees in any way other than to say that the president was not among them. "I can’t imagine they’d want to talk about it," he said.

"I can’t tell you that the people that I spoke with agree with me, or believe that prophecy can really help you understand what will happen next in the Middle East, but I’m not surprised that they’re intrigued."

The White House press office wasn’t able to confirm the visit for me, but there have been previous reports about White House Bible study groups inviting Christian authors to come speak.

Rosenberg — like Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, the authors of the phenomenally popular "Left Behind" series — writes fiction inspired by biblical prophecy about the apocalypse. The consistent theme is that certain current events presage the end times, the Rapture, and the return of Jesus Christ. Rosenberg’s particular pitch to journalists is that his books come true.

Here he is in a recent interview with Christian talk-show host Pat Robertson , talking about what he thinks is going to happen next: "Now I have to say, Pat, I believe that Ezekiel 38 and 39 — the prophecies that we’re talking about — I think this is about the end of radical Islam as we know it. God says He’s going to supernaturally judge Iran, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, these other countries. We’re talking about fire from heaven, a massive earthquake. It’s going to be devastating and tragic. But I believe that afterwards there’s going to be a great spiritual awakening. We’re seeing more Muslims coming to Christ right now than at any other time in history. But I think that’s just the beginning. We’ve got dark days ahead of us. But I believe there’s a light at the end of that tunnel."

Rosenberg says he got a call last year from a White House staffer. "He said ‘A lot of people over here are reading your novels, and they’re intrigued that these things keep on happening. . . . Your novels keep foreshadowing actual coming events. . . . And so we’re curious, how are you doing it? What’s the secret? Why don’t you come over and walk us through the story behind these novels?’ So I did."

Judy Keen first wrote back in October 2002, in USA Today, that "some White House staffers have been meeting weekly at hour-long prayer and Bible study sessions."

Elisabeth Bumiller wrote in the New York Times last year that "intelligent design was the subject of a weekly Bible study class several years ago when Charles W. Colson, the founder and chairman of Prison Fellowship Ministries, spoke to the group."

All this talk about family values, and preserving the institution of marriage as the best way to raise children, and nurture the next generation, and underneath it all the fervent hope that the end of the world will happen in their lifetimes.

Here is what it sounds like in D.C., when the rats begin abandoning a sinking ship:

LOSING DAVID BRODER….What’s the modern day equivalent of "losing Walter Cronkite"? Perhaps losing David Broder?

In today’s column he doesn’t quite come right out and say that we need to withdraw from Iraq, but he sure wiggles up to within kissing distance of it. Will the rest of centrist Washington follow?

This is painful for someone who grew up watching Walter Cronkite to read.  You just see in it so horribly the decline of the American spirit since the Reagan years. I doubt Drum was thinking in those terms when he wrote that…he’s probably thinking in terms of the environment of the inside the beltway kool kids.  And he’s probably right.  For the D.C. kool kids, loosing Broder may well be, in a sense, like loosing Walter Cronkite.  And this very nicely sums up what’s wrong with the mainstream news media today, and in particular, the shitfaced pundocracy.  Comparing David "they came in and trashed the place" Broder to Walter Cronkite is like comparing the Matterhorn to Walt Disney’s recreation of it.  One’s a real goddamned mountain and the other is a hollow fake created purely for entertainment.  And that’s Broder.  And that’s why he’s thought well of by the D.C. cocktail party crowd.  He entertains them.  If, as Broder said, Bill Clinton came in with his trailer trash crowd and "trashed the place", Broder was the man to tell them all their cheapshit Georgetown conceits were insightful and high principled pearls of wisdom.  As Atrios points out:

The country doesn’t care what David Broder thinks. He reflects the conventional wisdom of his clique back at them. That’s his audience.

Just so.  Broder’s audience is his own Washington inside the beltway clique.  The same mindless soulless lapdogs who have been breathlessly kissing the feet of anti democratic republican thugs ever since Kenneth Starr started sniffing Bill Clinton’s underwear.  What we’re seeing in the beltway pundocracy now, is that Deer In The Headlights expression of a person watching a catastrophe rushing at them like an out of control semi, bearing their own words on its bumperstickers. 

In the months and years to come remember: these people mindlessly, witlessly, cheered President Junior on his way to war, when anyone with half a brain and a functional conscience could tell it was bullshit.  These people mindlessly, witlessly, roused American passions for war.  Saddam was a threat to our national security they said.  And defended Bush and the republicans when they began shredding our consitution.  The war would be over in days they said.  They’ve been making excuses for why it’s been relentlessly killing people for going on four years now.  The Iraqis would shower our troops with flowers they said.   They’re killing and maiming more and more every day now.  The tyrannies of the middle east would all fall like dominos they said.  Now an anti-human religious fanatisism sweeps the entire Arab world, taking its moral authority from everything Bush has done to destroy democracy in America and ignore treaties on the conduct of war, and the practice of torture.  And now it’s become too much, even for the likes of David Broder.  Second thoughts?  No.  He’s looking for a way to deflect his share of the blame.  They all are.

They’ll say they were all bamboozled by a bunch of terrible, wicked men.  But…no.  They were willing to be fooled.  They held the Clintons in the same contempt Imelda Marco held her shoe shine girl, worshipped the republicans for the same arrogance of power that brought us war, corruption, and an America divided against itself like it hasn’t been since the civil war.  They roused the mob, not because they believed in Dubya, but because they loathed the democrats, and their prissy preoccupation with the rights of common people, and that bleeding heart liberal crap about liberty and justice for all.  Their support for President Junior was more a gesture of contempt for liberalism then a hurrah for republican oligarchy, but it did its work. 

Now president Smirk is egging the Israelis to make war on Syria, and rumbling that maybe we should start another one with Iran.  With what troops and with what money who knows…but the republicans don’t care about details like that.  They’re Big Picture folks.  Broder and the entire inside the beltway kool kids crowd hated liberals and democrats too much to notice or care who they were sanctifying, but it wasn’t their father’s republican party.  It is the party of Pat Robertson and James Dobson, men who think the end of the world will begin in the holy lands.  Now that they have the power they’ve always wanted, it’s too late to politely suggest to them that they’re making a mistake.  They think they’re doing God’s work.  They’re ushering in the Second Coming. 

Broder and his audience could have used their position to make this country a better place.  Instead they pissed on it, and blamed the democrats.  They didn’t think it mattered who governed America, as long as it wasn’t common trash who didn’t know how to throw a proper Georgetown party.  And now a terrible wind is blowing at the foundations of everything America ever stood for, everything America was, everything America could ever have become, and worst of all, it is bearing their own words back to them.

"Extremism is a powerful alliance of fear and certitude; complexity and humility are its natural foes. Faith and life are essentially mysterious, for neither God nor nature is easily explained or understood. Crusades are for the weak, literalism for the insecure."

Sure thing Mel…

"For 1,950 years [the church] does one thing and then in the ’60s, all of a sudden they turn everything inside out and begin to do strange things that go against the rules.  Everything that had been heresy is no longer heresy, according to the [new] rules. We [Catholics] are being cheated… The church has stopped being critical. It has relaxed. I don’t believe them, and I have no intention of following their trends.It’s the church that has abandoned me, not me who has abandoned it."

Mel Gibson, in an interview with El Pais in January 1992, discussing why his brand of Traditionalist Catholicism does not subscribe to the Second Vatican Council’s 1965 rulings on various subjects including who was responsible for the death of Jesus Christ.

"Why are they calling her a Nazi? …Because modern secular Judaism wants to blame the Holocaust on the Catholic Church. And it’s a lie. And it’s revisionism. And they’ve been working on that one for a while."

On criticism of Anne Catherine Emmerich, a nineteenth-century nun whose writings influenced his portrayal of Jesus’ death. The New Yorker, September 15, 2003

"That’s bullshit…I don’t want to be dissing my father. He never denied the Holocaust; he just said there were fewer than six million. I don’t want them having me dissing my father. I mean, he’s my father."

On allegations that his father is a Holocaust denier. The New Yorker, September 15, 2003

"I have friends and parents of friends who have numbers on their arms. The guy who taught me Spanish was a Holocaust survivor. He worked in a concentration camp in France. Yes, of course. Atrocities happened. War is horrible. The Second World War killed tens of millions of people. Some of them were Jews in concentration camps. Many people lost their lives. In the Ukraine, several million starved to death between 1932 and 1933. During the last century, 20 million people died in the Soviet Union."

In The New York Post, January 30, 2004

"They take it up the ass.  This [pointing to his butt] is only for taking a shit."

When asked what he thinks of homosexuals in an interview with El Pais in January 1992

"With this look, who’s going to think I’m gay. I don’t lend myself to that type of confusion. Do I sound like a homosexual? Do I talk like them? Do I move like them?" 

When asked during the El Pais interview if he is afraid of being mistaken for a homosexual, because he is an actor.

"I have no idea how anti-Semitism entered into it. But I do feel that gay people will burn in hell. Their way of life goes completely against God’s plan for procreation."

When asked by Philip Wuntch during filming of The Man Without A Face about the El Pais interview

"Fucking Jews… The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."

During his arrest for driving under the influence, July 2006

"What do you think you’re looking at, sugar tits?"

To a female sergeant during his arrest for DUI

"In its representation of its Jewish characters, The Passion of the Christ is without any doubt an anti-Semitic movie, and anybody who says otherwise knows nothing, or chooses to know nothing, about the visual history of anti-Semitism, in art and in film. What is so shocking about Gibson’s Jews is how unreconstructed they are in their stereotypical appearances and actions. These are not merely anti-Semitic images; these are classically anti-Semitic images."

 

Leon Wieseltier on The Passion of the Christ