According to “Storm Bear” at the Bilerico Project, a marriage supporter was playing a guitar when he “suddenly dropped like a tree” of an apparent heart attack or cardiac arrest. Police immediately swooped in and began administering CPR.
And while that was going on, one of the “loving” Christian protesters was chanting, “Satan Got You!” and “What is the Devil whispering in your ear about now?”
I yelled at the guy, “If you are such a Christian, why aren’t you praying for the guy dying on the concrete?” The protester replied, “God killed him for loving fags!!” The cops even stepped in and told the guy to shut his mouth.
Go read the whole thing. This happened in front of San Francisco’s city hall, I think as same sex couples were lined up for marriage licenses.
Love. People in love doing what people in love have done for millennia in one form or another; swearing to love honor and cherish until death do them part. A guitar player…was he married, or single and just in love with love…serenades the happy couples as they wait. I am desperately single myself, and had I a musical bone in my body, I would have done something like that for the waiting couples. Love has not been kind to me, and yet I am still in love with love. But then the guitar player falls to the ground, and an anti-gay protester with as much Christ in him as Himmler steps forward and shouts at him that the devil has him. Love.
Can we stop now with all that love the sinner hate the sin claptrap? I would like, very much right now, to be there to whisper, not shout, just whisper, something in this guy’s ear at the moment he finds himself on death’s doorstep. Not that the devil has him. Not that the next voice he hears will be the devil whispering in his ear. But softly, that Jesus is there with him now…and that guitar player he once cursed is standing right beside him.
I am a careful driver, having been scared witless in driver’s ed way back when by Highway Safety Foundation films such as Signal 30. Plus Traveler, my new Mercedes-Benz C300, cost me 45 thousand dollars. I’m here to tell you driving a 45 thousand dollar car down the road makes you a more careful driver. But the other day I was driving home and some lout in a bright red new model Mustang with racing stripes started hogging my tail on the Baltimore beltway…and what happened next got me to thinking again about something this American boy deeply regrets.
I was in the passing lane as I was…well…passing. But not fast enough for Mr. Mustang. We were approaching a series of nicely constructed twists and turns as two lanes of I-695 (the Baltimore beltway), peeled off onto I-83 heading into the city. Normally I would have just accelerated a tad and pulled over to let the jerk pass. But alas, I had been spending the night before at home watching Top Gear on YouTube, and whatever Mr. Mustang had under that hood, I knew what I had planted on the asphalt. Yes…I’m driving a little white Mercedes four door sedan and you’re driving a Mustang. What do you think that means? And I thought to myself, Okay…you’re on…
And I put my foot down. Not hard at all, just firmly and deliberately pressed Traveler’s fly-by-wire pedal a tad further into the Go zone. It wasn’t the first time by any means…I’ve taken Traveler up a few notches when I felt it was safe to explore what was up there. So I knew what to expect. Traveler is German and, more generally, European. Never mind the sports cars they make on that side of the Atlantic, even their four door sedans are built with a different mindset. Traveler woke up a bit from the stately sensible pace I normally drive at, hunkered down just a tad on the asphalt and simply walked away from Mr. Mustang. And I mean walked away. In the curve.
Traffic was very light and I had no trouble pressing it into the second set of curves after that one. Then I slowed back to normal. I was almost a half mile down the long straightaway into the city, before Mr. Mustang came into sight again out of the last curve. So having proved my point I was perfectly willing to let him pass me then, but he kept his distance.
Never mind how well Traveler is made, how tightly fitted together everything is, or how vault solid it feels sitting in it. I bought it for all that. Never mind. I have never, Never, owned a car that performs as well as this one. The only thing I’ve ever even sat in that’s in the same universe is my friend Stuart’s BMW roadster (which I’m sure could take on Traveler since its smaller and lighter and closer to the ground). I hadn’t really understood what owning a car made for the Autobahn meant until the first time I pressed down slightly on Traveler’s accelerator, to see what was up there a bit and my jaw nearly dropped on the carpet. Decades after my uncle blew away everything my little teenage brain thought it knew about luxury four door sedans with his 220D, my head still isn’t completely wrapped around the notion that a luxury four door sedan can do that. It wasn’t just that it was fast, or even that it was smooth fast. The car simply felt so taut and securely glued to the pavement at high speed that there was simply no sensation of being hurtled down the road at all, but more like…well…cruising. Comfortably. In the triple digits. This car could get me into serious trouble if I’m not careful.
Why doesn’t America build a car like this..??
My first car was a 1973 Ford Pinto. I bought it new when I got my first somewhat decent paying job after high school. It cost me $1997.48. I had to get mom to co-sign the loan, which took me the full three years to pay off. It wasn’t a great car by any means. It’s engine was tiny compared to other cars on the American highway…the 1.6 liter overhead valve Lotus block with a one barrel carburetor. It had a solid rear axle on leaf springs and the lightest, squirrelliest ass of any car I’ve ever driven. The slightest bump on the road would make its back end dance around. The fastest I ever had it to was 85 miles an hour and that was in neutral going down a mountain on the interstate in Nevada. It was like to rattle itself apart at that speed and so I didn’t keep it there long. But I took fastidious care of it, drove it to California and back, and got 135 thousand miles out of it before it all began to fall apart.
I felt as though I’d accomplished something stunning. In those days, nobody drove their cars for a hundred thousand miles, even if it was a nice one. It just wasn’t done. The car was supposed to have found its final resting place in the junk yard long before then. The odometers on American cars back then only had five digits. When the one on that Pinto turned over once again to all zeros, I pulled off the road and took a picture of it.
I’ve driven almost every car I’ve ever owned out to California and back. But that Pinto was the last American designed car I would ever do that with, and it broke down on the way home once. After the Pinto I was flat broke for many years and could only afford junkers, none of which I took on a road trip largely because I had no money for road trips. But I would have been crazy to trust any of them to get me through the Rockies, or across the Mojave, let alone the stretch of I-8 just south of the Imperial Valley. I knew the risk I was taking with the Pinto, but at least I’d been its only owner, had spent many long hours under its hood, and I knew it inside and out. The point is, I felt it was the same risk I would have been taking with any other American designed car of the time. Mom’s first car, a 1968 Plymouth Valiant with its 225 slant six engine was legendary for its stubborn never say die reliability, and it blew a coolant hose on the one trip out to California it took. But that kind of reliability was what you reckoned on back in those days.
I became entranced by Mercedes-Benz sedans around 1971, after an uncle brought his new 220D down for a visit. That car just blew everything my little teenage brain thought it knew about luxury cars away. I figured back then that a luxury car was one that had all the options, and maybe even a few you couldn’t get on other cars. Leather upholstery. Air conditioning. Stereo FM radio. Power seats! Then comes my uncle down for a visit in this boxy little German car and it just made my jaw drop.
First of all, it was a diesel. I thought diesels were what you put into trucks, and here was one in a luxury car. And you knew it was a diesel the moment he started it up. That just didn’t compute. But it was sitting down in it that first time, that I realized I was in a different world. It wasn’t flashy, not ostentatiously expensive at all like the Cadillacs. It was rather understated. But it was built like a goddamned vault. Everything fit together exactly right…there wasn’t anything in that interior or on the dash that was the slightest bit off. Everything you touched felt solid. The door handles, the buttons on the dash, the sun visors. And when my uncle drove us somewhere in it, that car was Quiet in a way I’d never experienced before. Not muffled quiet, but solid quiet. When my uncle left, I began digging up information about Mercedes-Benz and talking to anyone I could who owned one. And then I discovered the other jaw dropping thing about them: Their owners typically drove them well over a hundred thousand miles. The joke was, 100k and it’s just broken in. I began falling in love.
Understand, this was at a time when the odometer on American cars only had five digits on them. You just didn’t expect to drive a car that far because you knew it would be coming completely apart by then. We had neighbors and friends who routinely traded in their cars after they hit 50k, because you just expected it would be more trouble then it was worth after that. Here was the Mercedes, proving that this didn’t have to be so. You could make a car last. But they were expensive. People could point to the cost of a Mercedes and say, ‘well, for that money you could buy several American cars though’.
Then came the oil embargo, and Detroit suddenly found its ass was getting kicked by the Japanese. First it was on fuel economy. The little Japanese cars just ran rings around ours on gas mileage, right as the price of gas was starting to go up. But later, and devastatingly, they began pummeling Detroit on quality.
The argument up until then had been that, well sure some European cars are better…but look at how much more expensive they are. Here in America, we build cars for the common man. They’re affordable. Maybe they aren’t as good, but at least the average American can afford one. Well, the Japanese slapped them upside the head on that one. Suddenly cars were coming into the country that were cheaper, And Better.
A friend of mine bought a Toyota hatchback back then, and I remember us popping the hood and just marveling at how tightly laid out that engine compartment was, and at all the simple little things they did to protect the hoses and electrical lines from wear and tear. Many of the parts had little tick marks on them, to show the factory workers how they were supposed to be fitted together. Hoses had little arrows printed on them which matched up to little arrows that were literally cast into the fittings they connected to. What a concept…the parts themselves showed the workers how to put them together. Detroit was struggling then to hold on against the Japanese onslaught…American Motors was headed for bankruptcy and would finally fold in 1987…and I took one look inside the engine compartment of my friend’s new Toyota and knew they were all doomed unless they got their act together. It just couldn’t be business as usual anymore. But they never really got that message. Not completely.
Here’s a passage from Time Magazine article from 1980…
In these late summer days, Detroit’s automakers are bustling to complete billion-dollar programs that they hope will turn the fortunes of their industry. The Jefferson Avenue plant, for example, is daily turning out 400 new Dodge Aries, Chrysler’s front-wheel-drive K-car that will determine whether the company survives as a major automobile producer.
Twenty-five miles away, at Ford Motor Co.’s Wayne, Mich., plant, workmen are busily assembling the company’s new subcompacts, the Ford Escort and the Mercury Lynx. Developed at a cost of $3 billion, the new cars are the first autos that Ford has built from the ground up since the Model A in 1927.
If you look closely, you can see the root of the problem in that last paragraph. …the new cars are the first autos that Ford has built from the ground up since the Model A in 1927. Your typical American car buyer would have scoffed at that. Why…they come out with a new model every year. But they didn’t. They just kept rehashing the old stuff with new skins. Hell, the legendary Ford Mustang was based on the friggin’ Ford Falcon.
This…
…and this…
…are the same fucking car where it counts, in the chassis suspension and drive train.
There’s your problem right there. Michael Nesmith mocked it back in 1981, a year after that Time article I quoted above appeared, in his video LP, Elephant Parts…
Jeremy Clarkson, in his video on the quality of American cars, The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly (in eight parts on YouTube), puts the blame on our disposable culture. Well…if you take his insults seriously, he also blames it on our being a bunch of inbred ignorant hicks too. I can’t seem to find this video for sale here in the U.S…oddly enough…or I’d post a link to where you can buy it. I suppose that might have something to do with the fact that he spends the first five minutes of the video bellyaching about everything he doesn’t like about America. And about a third of the rest of the video as well. You need to get past that. He’s an automobile enthusiast and he knows what a good car is. And if you know what a good car is too then it isn’t all that surprising that Clarkson really trashes most of what he finds on his desert test track in that video. And I don’t think he actually hates us or he wouldn’t be so offended by our halfassed efforts at making cars. I think he does, for all the snark about billy-bob and American ignorance, honestly expect better of us. I would like to wave his video in the faces of everyone on the GM, Ford and Chrysler board of directors. Although I think Chrysler already got an earful of it from Daimler before the divorce.
I would especially like to wave at them this one point Clarkson raises in that video, and which I’d like to restate here because it’s important.
Look at this…
…and then, this…
…and ask yourself what went wrong. The same country made both of those things. And I’m not cheating here. The airplane represents the best of it’s class. It’s a military spy plane. It’s not a fighter plane, but it’s fast, damn fast, because it has to be to avoid being shot down. It flies high and fast so it can do it’s job. It’s design and execution brilliantly and…beautifully…fulfill its function. The other photo is of a mini van. Okay, minivans aren’t supposed to be fast and flashy. They don’t even have to be beautiful really. But a mini van has its function too. And that minivan represented at the time of it’s making, seriously, the best this country could do at manufacturing something that does what a minivan is supposed to do. And if that’s not depressing enough, the airplane, an SR71, was born in 1964. The mini van, a Ford Aerostar, is a product of the early 1990s.
Three decades after producing the SR71, we were making Ford Aerostars. Which wouldn’t be so bad if we had made something better we could point to…some mini van that just ran and ran and ran and would never say die, was safe to drive, handled well, was put together with care and craftsmanship, and did its job impeccably. Don’t tell me that the country that can produce the SR71 couldn’t do that. But we didn’t. American mini vans were then, and still are, abominations. And so are most of our sedans, our coupes, and our sports cars. And the ones that are good, supposedly the best of breed, still don’t even touch the best that come from Europe. We’re not even on the same planet. In his video, Clarkson tests out a new Cadillac XLR…one of these…
By all rights it ought to be as good a performer as it looks. And yet…it’s horrible. Clarkson notes all the ways it fails on the track to be a good sports roadster, but it was his tour of the mind numbingly stupid low quality of materials and build inside the cockpit and was the biggest letdown. It was all too familiar territory. From the cheesy workmanship on the upholstery, to the cheap plastic in the center console, and the cheap toy like sounds the shift lever made when you moved it, I saw the same pathetic lack of pride and care that has kept me out of American big three designed cars ever since I could afford to buy one again.
In 1991 I was mowing lawns and doing spot work at temp agencies to make ends meet. I was living in a friend’s basement wondering what the hell I was going to do with my life when another friend called with a job offer to write software for Baltimore Gas and Electric. I’d been tinkering around with the new desktop computers since the mid-1980s, and even had the odd job setting other folks up with theirs. The money was fantastic considering I was officially below the poverty line. But there was a catch. I had to drive up to Baltimore and I had no car. So the agency I signed on with rented me one: a 1991 Chevrolet Geo Prism.
It was wonderful…everything I’d ever hoped an American economy car could be. It was well made, not fabulously well made like my uncle’s Mercedes, but well made nonetheless. It drove well, got great gas mileage, and just felt overall like it would drive forever without giving you a lot of headaches. I later learned the Prism was a Toyota Corolla under the skin. (sigh) I had it for a week and then I had to swap it for a different one because the car rental agency had some sort of policy that you couldn’t hold onto a car for more then a week. The next car they gave me was a Chevrolet Cavalier. The difference between them couldn’t have been more stark. The Chevy certainly looked like a nicer car. But then you drove it. Small as it was, it handled like a cow. And it rattled. I hadn’t noticed really, how well made the Prism had been until I drove the Chevy and it started rattling. The dashboard was plastic, as the Prism’s had been. But it felt cheap where the Prism’s didn’t. Point of fact, nice as the car looked, everything about it just felt cheap.
After my first paycheck I arranged to buy a junker from a friend of a friend. I kept it together with chicken wire and duct tape until I felt confident enough in my new career to buy my first new car since the ’73 Pinto. It was 1993, and when I figured I could finally afford it, the first thing I did was drive right to my nearest Chevy dealer and buy…a Prism. I never regretted it. I drove that thing to California twice, and twice more around the four corners area of the American southwest. I drove it across the Mojave Desert and the Imperial Valley. I still vividly remember how well the car behaved in the high altitudes of the Rockies west of Denver. In 1974 I’d taken the Pinto along the same route through the mountains and the poor thing huffed and puffed through it’s little one barrel carburetor like it was dying of asthma. The Prism just hummed along unperturbed. Cheap, basic transportation that just worked. And Americans had built it.
That’s right. It had come off the same factory lines in southern California that the Toyota Corolla did. That car was made in America. But it wasn’t a GM product. That’s the difference. Not American workmanship. American workers can build a great car when they’re given a great car to build. The proof as far as I’m concerned was in the Prism. I got over two-hundred thousand miles out of it. After the Prism I bought a 2005 Honda Accord five speed with all the trimmings. It was just lovely, and as solid as the Cavalier had been a plastic can full of rattles. The Honda was also made in America, on an assembly line in Kentucky.
And I don’t think the problem is American engineering either. Take another look at that SR71. No. The problem isn’t American workmanship nor American Engineering, but American corporate mentality. The boardrooms in Detroit don’t care enough to make the best cars they can. They just have to be good enough to sell.
In his video, Clarkson demonstrates what comes of that by trying to fill a 1989 Lincoln and a 1989 Jaguar sedan both with water. Yes, yes…it’s over the top…but it makes its point. And he’s not cheating just by using an old American car for the test because he compares it to a perfectly lousy European car of the same model year. The Jaguar Clarkson uses, and as he notes, is regarded as being the worst car ever made in Britain. But if fit and finish were all there were to a car, the Jag would shine. You can’t fill a 1989 Lincoln with water, it isn’t built tight enough. In the video the Lincoln leaks like a sieve. But you can fill the Jag almost to the windows.
Now Cadillac is making the XLR, and it’s supposed to compete with the BMWs and Mercedes roadsters of its class and it is Still junk. Not in junk in the sense that it has springs popping out from the seats, and pistons falling out of the engine, but junk in the sense that it’s still being made as though good enough was good enough. You don’t put a shift lever that makes plastic toy sounds when you move it into a 75 thousand dollar car. You don’t give it a cheap plastic fake wood ashtray lid that looks more like a toy part then a 75 thousand dollar car part. Well…we do. To the rest of the world, it must seem like we simply can’t make a good car.
Yes we can. That’s the damnable fact. We can do better. Tons better. We just don’t. Clarkson lays the blame for that on our disposable culture. I don’t think that’s the root of it though. We have a management problem, not an engineering problem, and not a skilled worker problem. The boardrooms just aren’t interested in making good cars.
Why? I don’t think they’re enthusiasts. Not for automobiles anyway. They’re into business, not cars. They’re about running corporations, not driving cars. The automobile doesn’t get their blood going. Wringing out the last little bit of road hugging performance out of a suspension doesn’t do it for them the way wringing out the last little bit of efficiency in a just-in-time delivery pipeline does. They’re not into cars, so much as Product. And so Product is what we get.
There’s another difference too I think. Over here, many car enthusiasts work on their own cars and customize them heavily. New engine, new drive train, new suspension. You see people completely re-doing the interior and exterior, sometimes to the point that you can’t even recognize what the base vehicle actually was. The after-market here for car parts and customizing is huge. So a lot of enthusiasts don’t really care so much what Detroit gives them to start with. That takes some pressure off.
But most folks don’t do that. They need a good car they can buy right off the lot and it’s that customer base that has walked away from Detroit over the past few decades, and which Detroit simply won’t win back unless they start paying attention to workmanship. I read a story some years ago, about the frustration some GM engineers had being constantly overruled by management and the design department. We don’t need to make it that good…it’s too costly to do it that way…make it cheaper…make it flashier…good looks sell better then good engineering… One day, so the story went, in protest, the engineers all came into a design meeting with management wearing visitor’s badges. That’s the problem. Ever since Japan kicked their butts they’ve been saying they get the message. And they are certainly not making the same drek they did back in the 1970s and 80s or they’d all be out of business by now. But the mindset is still Good Enough and this country will never produce anything like the Toyotas or Hondas, let alone the BMWs and Mercedes, let alone the Rolls and Bentleys, until good enough isn’t anymore.
This is the perenial problem with my countrymen. We want to win at everything we do. We are a very competitive people. We love a good contest. But we don’t really think about what winning means. Let me give you a specific example. We’re having a little culture war here in America, and at the center of it is religion. More specifically, the brand of protestant Christianity practiced over here. The religious right likes to point to the fact that mainline liberal protestant churches are loosing membership, whilst their own are undergoing vast increases in size. The stellar examples of this, are the American Megachurches. These aren’t so much churches as indoor football stadiums, capable, I am not kidding, of seating thousands of people.
These Megachurches usually have several stadium size TV screens mounted behind the pulpits so the back rows can see what’s going on. The pulpits are on a huge stage now, suitable more for a rock concert then a sermon. They have stores where you can buy videos of previous sermons, books from Christian publishing houses, and everything from Christian greeting cards to keychains. Some Megachurches have in them, I am not kidding, indoor basketball courts, game rooms and sports size swimming pools. There are day care centers, and of course, private Christian schools often located on the grounds, if not right in the Megasanctuary itself. Every Sunday here in America these days, hundreds of thousands of American fundamentalists pile into huge Megachurches beside thousands of other worshipers and enjoy a multimedia extravaganza. Oh…and a sermon too. Which they can buy later on DVD. The religious right points to all this as proof that they are winning the battle for souls over the liberal mainline churches hands down. But what is ‘winning’?
So…I was fiddling around a bit at my drafting table…still trying desperately to get my drawing groove back so I can pick up and continue on with my cartoon series, A Coming Out Story. It’s been almost a year since I last updated it. (sigh) I think finally getting in touch with the object of my affections from way back then has really messed up my head on that one. It’s probably messed up my head in a lot of other ways too, all coming back to my creative sense. It just feels too tender right now.
Every now and then I see a beautiful face or a beautiful pose and it sticks with me and I have to at least sketch it out, and maybe improvise on it a tad. So I’m not completely dried up. I suppose as long as there are beautiful males on this planet I will never be completely without inspiration. I sketched this out a little while ago, based loosely on a photo I ran across online. The pose was lovely, and you very seldom see nice cutoffs anymore. But I had to change it around a tad to suit me…
This is the sort of thing that causes some of my gay friends to question my homosexuality. But I am not into hunks, and I really hate the pejorative ‘twink’. Not that ‘twink’ doesn’t fit some guys, just not the guys I like. This guy’s entirely a figment of my imagination, like the pirate I drew a while ago, and like the pirate, I felt somehow like I was coming to know him while I drew him. He’s a bit on the lean side, but fit, and I tried to put a sense of playful energy in the pose, like before he’ll give you a roll in the sack he’d like to run you around the court a few times first to size you up. He’s no airhead. I tried to put some intelligence in the direct look he’s giving you. But he likes to be sexy too. There was a time when that was okay.
I’ve worked on the pirate some more too, since you last saw him…most background stuff. Hopefully I’ll have enough energy this week to charcoal and ink up these two. But I can’t promise that. There’s a part of me that’s aching now…really, really badly…and it’s all tied up in with the drawing side of my brain.
Now I’m going for a cigar walk. Then to bed. Hopefully to dream.
As Grant Cogswell pointed out in his feature piece last week, there once was a man called Anton LaVey, and Anton LaVey, whilst he lived, tried really, really hard to be The Evilest Man Who Ever Was. Mostly he was just bald and vaguely douche-bag-ish: Like a martini-sipping Fu-Manchu in a priest suit who looked like he had to crap a walrus. But still. He tried really, really hard.
Indeed, Anton wanted to be evil, seriously evil, so he did the only evil thing an evil person in his evil position could do: He poured himself a stiff drink, sat down, and thought really really hard about, well, evil.
…
His conclusions and the crux of his Satanic philosophy ran thusly: We humans are, in every sense, rotten, rude, paranoid, and less than fresh. People are wicked and untrustworthy animals. All so-called “virtues” and “good deeds” are self-delusive ego-kicks, hip, hip, hooray. That’s the whole thing in a devilicious nutshell.
Sound familiar? Well…yeah actually. Ryan points us to a Colbert interview of George Will, who obligingly goes on just as he’s done for decades now about the difference between liberals and conservatives…
That’s right. Straight from the horsey mouth of the “leading pundit of conservatism in the nation”: The difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals are fools who believe in the goodness of human nature and the basic equality of all people. Like in the, uh, Declaration of Independence and junk. (And, if you’ll pardon the expression, “The Bible”.) They believe misguidedly that “something straight” can be made out of the “crooked timber” that is humanity. Man is clearly rotten and selfish by design. There can be no myth of equality…um….it only translates to “mediocrity”, and…uh…Satan? Is that you? It’s me, George Will.
Of course you could argue that conservatives would strongly disagree with LaVey that this broken human nature means we should just go ahead and give in to our basest nature. On the contrary, we need a strong government based on strong moral values to keep our base nature in check. Well…actually…Your base nature. You. The common folk. The rich and powerful are another story. What Reagan and Bush have made pretty clear is that They get to indulge their every selfish greedy, crooked, broken desire to their heart’s content. After all…they’re on top. And isn’t that pure LaVey after all?
1. Blessed are the strong, for they shall possess the earth. Cursed are the weak, for they shall inherit the yoke!
2. Blessed are the powerful, for they shall be reverenced among men. Cursed are the feeble, for they shall inherit the yoke!
3. Blessed are the bold, for they shall be masters of the world. Cursed are the righteously humble, for they shall be trodden under cloven hoofs!
4. Blessed are the victorious, for victory is the basis of right. Cursed are the vanquished, for they shall remain vassals forever!
5. Blessed are the iron handed, for the unfit shall flee before them. Cursed are the poor in spirit, for they shall be spat upon!
-Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Bible, The Book Of Satan, Chapter 5.
…and so on. Yes, I have a copy…bought back in the early 70s just out of shear curiosity. It never dawned on me until now to really look at how closely this guy’s ideas map to Ayn Rand’s and the greed is good conservative movement she spawned. And if you think Rand would have been outraged at being compared to the likes of LaVey, you’re probably right. She often claimed that her philosophy regarded predators as parasites, whereas the truly selfish man did not simply take from the weak, but rather created his own wealth. But Rand was hardly averse to stealing outright from the weak. In point of fact, she really did believe that was the prerogative of the powerful…
On the 125th anniversary of the Dred Scott decision, Ayn Rand — who surely would have approved of its fearless pronouncements on inequality — died at the age of 77. The right-wing cult philosopher and high priestess of tedium somehow managed to sell millions of copies of her nearly unreadable novels from the 1950s onward, including paperweights such as The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. On 6 March 1974, following a speech to the Army cadets at West Point, Rand was asked about the dispossession of American Indian land. In short, she approved of the idea.
They didn’t have any rights to the land, and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights which they had not conceived and were not using . . . . What was it that they were fighting for, when they opposed white men on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existence, their ‘right’ to keep part of the earth untouched, unused and not even as property, but just keep everybody out so that you will live practically like an animal, or a few caves above it. Any white person who brings the element of civilization has the right to take over this continent.
Blessed are the strong, for they shall possess the earth. Cursed are the weak, for they shall inherit the yoke! When they talk to you about morality, and Christian values, laugh in their face. They don’t want to get government off your back, so much as get it out of the way so they can put a leash around your neck and a brand on your forehead and call you their own. They are less Christ, then LaVey.
We are not devils. We are not angels. We are not destroyers, we are not creators. We are not lords nor are we peasants. We are human. We are all of these. There is no dark, there is no light, there is simply what we are. The abyss isn’t our destiny any more then heaven is. But the path to oblivion is paved with lies. We neither sustain ourselves nor make a future possible by throwing ourselves into the arms of gurus who tell us we are something that we are not. Ask the shades that walk the battlegrounds on this poor earth, where we killed each other by the thousands to appease the bottomless greed of the few and their hatred of everything fine and noble a human being can be. Blessed are they who question, for they will wear no chains.
What is truth? Can you spot the real from the nicely packaged fake? Could you walk into a shop in some quaint little village in some far-away land, and know whether the friendly man behind the counter is offering to sell you an authentic Rolex or just trying to pass off a slick looking facsimile that won’t keep time worth a damn to a naive tourist? Just how good a judge are you of Authenticity anyway?
Calling him "just plain wrong," Bishop William Murphy has blasted Gov. David A. Paterson for ordering state agencies to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.
…
Murphy wrote, "I fail to understand how" a homosexual union "can be called marriage. … No matter how much some may wish to apply the term ‘marriage,’ it does not fit because it fails the test of truth and authenticity."
Authentic:
In response, diocesan spokesman Sean Dolan said Murphy "is not imposing his will. He is exercising his responsibility as the shepherd of this diocese to teach the faith.
"That said," he added, "the message should not be misconstrued as an attack on the human dignity of homosexual people. The church teaches that we must treat homosexuals with dignity and love, as we would all God’s children."
Their love is fake. But ours is real. Easy payments too.
Your toy balloon has sailed in the sky
But now it must fall to the ground
Now you’re sad eyes reveal
Just how badly you feel
‘Cause there is no easy way down
The view from the cliffs
Must have been exciting
(Exiting, exciting, exciting)
And up to the peaks you were bound
Now you’re stranded all alone
And the path leads unknown
And there is no easy way down
No it isn’t very easy
(No easy way down)
When you’re left on your own
(No easy way down)
No it isn’t very easy
When each road you take
Is one more mistake
And there’s no one to break your fall
And lead you back home
LOS ANGELES – A federal judge suspended the obscenity trial of a Los Angeles porn distributor Wednesday following a newspaper report that the judge had sexually explicit material on his own Web site.
Judge Alex Kozinski on Wednesday granted a joint motion to suspend the trial after the prosecution said it needed time to look into the issue of the judge’s Web site.
The judge told the jury to return on Monday. The panel spent hours at the Pasadena offices of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals watching videos depicting bestiality and extreme fetishes.
Kozinski is chief justice of the 9th Circuit but is serving as a trial judge in the obscenity case. Kozinski said he thought the material on his Web site couldn’t be seen by the public, the Los Angeles Times reported on its Web site. The images included a video of a "half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal," the newspaper reported.
This is…not what I needed to be reading in the news feeds first thing in the morning. Human sexuality is a…strange thing to behold…sometimes.
Like…here… (via Dan Savage at SLOG) I probably didn’t need to be reading this before bedtime last night…
Hey, Cracked, this just arrived in my mailbox—and I actually don’t think it’s the 11th most terrifying guide to sex. I think it belongs somewhere in the top three. I certainly think it’s scarier than your #1 pick, A Hand in the Bush: The Fine Art of Vaginal Fisting, and way, way scarier than your #2 pick, Intimate Invasions: The Erotic Ins & Outs of Enema Play. I give you… The Toybag Guide to Ageplay…
I get asked all the time what Age Play is. It can mean a thousand different things to a thousand different sexual adventurers or curious roleplaying enthusiasts, but there are key threads that run through it.
Age play is any interaction or roleplay between consenting adults (or enjoyed solo by an adult) involving the concept of age as a dynamic… Age play incorporates a sensual or sexual element, buy many "age players," "kidz," babiez," or "littles" enjoy "pure" age play that is just about the role and not about any hanky panky.
Age play is not pedophilia, child porn, or individuals interested in playing with actual biological children. Age Players may use the props of "bio kids," but we are into the props and trappings, not the kids themselves in any way.
Go check out the cover of that book Savage has on display in that post. It’s…disturbing all right…
…and I suppose because I am a geek, my mind starts wondering about where the link might be between this behavior, which really squiks me out, and how we humans are always bestowing fond diminutives on the one we love. Ever call your darling ‘baby’? Now, you didn’t really mean that literally did you…and yet that got in there somehow. We use words like ‘girl’ and ‘boy’ even though we’re referring to grown adults. And then…again probably because I am a geek…the words of physicist Richard Feynman bubble into this train of thought…
Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, “But how can it be like that?” because you will get “down the drain”, into a blind alley from which no one has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that.
Feynman was talking about quantum mechanics, but there are lotsa more rabbit holes a brain can go down besides that one. Human sexuality for one. I guess it’s what you get when you plop that rational logical thinking brain down on top of the old primate brain, down on top of the old mammalian brain, down on top of the lizard brain. And God only knows what’s below that. It bears close examination only by interested scientists, anthropologists and other researchers with steady nerves. The rest of us are probably better off not knowing what our neighbors are up to.
I am the last person on earth to be surprised to read that a judge in a bestiality case has a web site where he’s posted videos of himself some guy cavorting with animals. Squiked out, yes, but not surprised. And probably a tad more resigned to it then most of you. I am a romantic. I really don’t like seeing this…really don’t like watching sex being dragged into the gutter. But I know better then to expect it won’t be. When I was a young man, only a few years out to myself, I had to walk a gauntlet of hard core heterosexual peep show magazines just to buy a copy of The Advocate or get a copy of the local free gay paper, because respectable news stands back then wouldn’t carry them. I was a Baptist boy and it was an education. Nothing I ever heard on the school yard playing ground, no dirty joke told among the rude boys, prepared me for what I saw in those adult bookstores. I consider it one of the few benefits of growing up in more oppressive times because ever since then, whenever some gay hater starts yap, yap, yapping about how perverted homosexual sex is (Hi Pete!) I instantly find myself thinking that they’re either naive, stupid, a liar or all of the above.
Strange? Strange? Well I’m here to tell you heterosexuals know how to get their strange on too and if you haven’t seen it that’s because you haven’t looked. The human family is just plain strange period. Gay people have no monopoly on that, and there are plenty of us who find all of that stuff positively bizarre too.
[Update…] According to Slashdot, the files on that judge’s web site also included …images of masturbation, public sex, contortionist sex, a transsexual striptease, and a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows… Wasn’t that a Monty Python skit…?
[Update…] It wasn’t a video of the judge apparently…my bad…
Those were just a few of the terms hurled my way in 2003 when I said that the Supreme Court’s Texas sodomy decision opened the door to the redefinition of marriage.
When I wasn’t ducking the epithets, I was being laughed at, mocked, and given the crazy-uncle-at-the-holidays treatment by the media. Or I was being told I should resign from my leadership post by some Senate colleagues.
Five years later, do I regret sounding the alarm about marriage? No.
I’m just saddened that time has proved right those of us who worried about the future of marriage as the union of husband and wife, deeply rooted not only in our traditions, our faiths, but in the facts of human nature: as Pope Benedict said, "The cradle of life and love," connecting mothers and fathers to their children.
So sad… So sad… So tell us how were you proven right Rick…
The latest distressing news came last week in California. The state Supreme Court there ruled, 4-3, that same-sex couples can marry.
No kidding? Wow…
Look at Norway. It began allowing same-sex marriage in the 1990s. In just the last decade, its heterosexual-marriage rates have nose-dived and its out-of-wedlock birthrate skyrocketed to 80 percent for firstborn children. Too bad for those kids who probably won’t have a dad around, but we can’t let the welfare of children stand in the way of social affirmation, can we?
OSLO, Norway (AP) – Two Norwegian opposition parties on Thursday backed the rights of gay couples to marry in church, adopt and have assisted pregnancies, effectively assuring the passage of a new equality law next month.
The ruling three-party government proposed a law in March giving gay couples equal rights to heterosexuals but disagreements within the coalition cast doubt on whether it would receive enough votes to pass.
But two opposition parties announced Thursday they were backing the proposals, a move welcomed by gay rights groups, which should ensure a parliamentary majority and allow the law to be passed.
Okay…in other words… Norway suffered a staggering rise in out of wedlock births and an equally staggering decline in heterosexual marriages since it began allowing same-sex marriages in the 1990s, and just one week after your column warning us about that Norway’s parliament announces it is ready to give same sex the right to marry. No you drooling sack of Santorum, Norway hasn’t had same-sex marriage since…it was 1993 since you couldn’t be bothered to check the actual date either. It’s had a form of civil unions.
Okay…fine…so it was civil unions that caused the decline in Norway then…right? Erm…no… You’re waving Stanley Kurtz’ claptrap years after it was debunked you moron. Here…let some fellow republicans slap some wake up upside your head…
Some on the far right claim that the experiences with same-sex marriage in the international community prove that same-sex marriage destroys the institution of marriage. This claim, however, is unsupported by the facts. Stanley Kurtz, of the Hoover Institution, insists, in an article for The Weekly Standard, that same-sex marriage has undermined the institution of marriage in Scandinavia. (Scandinavia includes the countries of Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Much debate on this issue also has included the Netherlands.) An examination of the facts severely undermines Kurtz’s assertion. Professor M.V. Lee Badgett from the University of Massachusetts Amherst recently authored a study examining Kurtz’s conclusion. Click here to read the entire study. Among the report’s key findings:
"There is no evidence that giving partnership rights to same-sex couples had any impact on heterosexual marriage in Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands. Marriage rates, divorce rates, and non-marital birth rates have been changing in Scandinavia, Europe and the United States for the past thirty years. But those changes have occurred in all countries, regardless of whether or not they adopted same-sex partnership laws, and these trends were underway well before the passage of laws that gave same-sex couples rights."
"Divorce rates (in Scandinavia) have not risen since the passage of partnership laws and marriage rates have remained stable or actually increased."
"Non-marital birth rates have not risen faster in Scandinavia or the Netherlands since the passage of partnership laws. Although there has been a long-term trend toward the separation of sex, reproduction, and marriage in the industrialized west, this trend is unrelated to the legal recognition of same-sex couples."
"Non-marital birth rates changed just as much in countries without partnership laws as in countries that legally recognize same-sex couples’ partnerships."
"The legal and cultural context in the United States gives many more incentives for heterosexual couples to marry than in Europe and those incentives will still exist even if same-sex couples can marry. Giving same-sex couples marriage or marriage-like rights has not undermined heterosexual marriage in Europe, and it is not likely to do so in the United States."
The main evidence Kurtz points to is the increase in cohabitation rates among unmarried heterosexual couples and the increase in births to unmarried mothers. Roughly half of all children in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are now born to unmarried parents. In Denmark, the number of cohabiting couples with children rose by 25 percent in the 1990s. From these statistics Kurtz concludes that " … married parenthood has become a minority phenomenon," and—surprise—he blames gay marriage.
But Kurtz’s interpretation of the statistics is incorrect. Parenthood within marriage is still the norm—most cohabitating couples marry after they start having children. In Sweden, for instance, 70 percent of cohabiters wed after their first child is born. Indeed, in Scandinavia the majority of families with children are headed by married parents. In Denmark and Norway, roughly four out of five couples with children were married in 2003. In the Netherlands, a bit south of Scandinavia, 90 percent of heterosexual couples with kids are married.
Emphasis mine. And you can be sure Kurtz knew that when he published his dire warnings about the effect of same-sex marriage in Scandinavia. After all…he had to have poured over the data in his search for evidence damning gay people. He’d have looked at the entire marriage rate data, never doubt it, and he had to have seen that part. He withheld it because it effectively took away his ammunition.
But more specifically with respect to civil unions, look at what the data tells us:
Before 1993, the percentage of births outside of marriage grew steadily by an average of about 9% per year.
After civil unions were enacted in 1993, the growth of that birth rate slowed dramatically. The the growth rate fell from 9% per year to an average of less than 1.5% per year between 1993 and 2006.
Which means that if there were a cause and effect between Norway’s birth rate outside of marriage and providing civil unions for same-sex couples, the data suggests that civil unions actually had a dramatic affect in slowing the rate of births outside of marriage.
The chart Burroway provides shows the rate climbing since the mid-70s, and then suddenly tapering off after civil unions were enacted. Of course, coincidence is not causality, and the plain fact is that civil unions were probably of utterly no consequence in any sense. Since when did heterosexuals decide how to live their intimate lives based on what homosexuals do with theirs? Is this rocket science?
What happened to change how heterosexuals lived their lives in the 1970s wasn’t gay liberation, but women’s. The pill happened. Women became more independent of men. They could have their own lives. Marriage wasn’t a foregone conclusion for them, the home not the only life they were allowed to have anymore. Given all that, of course the patterns of marriage would change. Opposite sex couples still marry…they just go down a different road to it now…both of them, together, as equals.
And make no mistake…that’s what Santorum and his kind want to change. This isn’t about same-sex marriage. It’s about the prerogative of powerful males. It’s about taking us all back to a day when certain males of a certain class had power and status simply by virtue of their being males of a certain class, and the rest of us, women, minorities, laborers, heathens, knew our place and our lives only had context in service to them. It was once their world, and the rest of us just lived in it. That’s why they fight. Because in this world of ever expanding knowledge, freedom and justice, they are the biggest losers. Where status doesn’t count, you actually have to be something, and all they know how to be, is 18th century privileged males.
Actually Rick, the voters of Pennsylvania gave you a wake-up call when they booted your ass out of office last election. And you’re still walking though life half-asleep, half comatose, aren’t you?
When Smirk entered the White House in 2001, the price of gasoline was bumping around the $1.80 mark. Crude was bumping around the $30 a barrel mark. You can’t blame that jackass and his idiot henchmen for all of the increase, but his splendid little war is one factor exacerbating it. The other is actually more Reagan’s fault then Bush’s. Reagan began the financial deregulation process that led straight to the sub prime mortgage meltdown we have now, and the resulting credit crunch. Investors, worried that all of a sudden real estate isn’t the safe haven for money it used to be, are putting their dough into buying commodities like…er…crude oil…which drives up the price.
Why it is that people assume republicans are better at managing an economy then democrats is beyond me, other then I guess people think that if you’re rich you must know how to make money. Some rich people do. Some rich people absolutely love to make money. And those people rise the standard of living for everyone. Their energy makes the world a better place. But others are rich because they merely hunger for wealth and they don’t care how they get it. The ones of low ambition turn to petty crime. The really ambitious ones build empires, corrupt governments, and legally rape everyone and everything around them blind. Guess which sort gravitate to the republican party.
After more than five years of petroleum price increases, American consumers appear to be expecting the worst. A CNN poll taken last week showed that 59 percent of Americans believe it is very likely that they will pay $5 a gallon for gasoline before the end of the year and that an additional 27 percent say it is somewhat likely.
Economists say these expectations make it more probable that people will change behavior rather than simply wait for a turn in the traditional up-and-down cycle of commodity prices. "People now realize that prices may come back down, but they’re not going down to where they were," said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com. "We’re going to have to live with higher energy prices for a while. And that’s affecting their behavior and what they buy and don’t buy."
For Rusty Davis, a handyman from Arlington, the high cost of gasoline is changing the way he runs his business. He has started to refuse jobs outside the county. When he does travel to jobs, he now takes his fuel-efficient car and leaves behind his work van, which gets only 12 miles to the gallon. He also used to do free estimates in person. Now he does them over the phone.
My brother does that kind of work for a living, and when I read that I thought of him. He doesn’t do estimates over the phone for the obvious reason that you need to see the situation you’re getting into before you bid on it if you don’t want any unpleasant surprises gulping down your profit margin. I would expect he just adds in the higher cost of gas to his bids now, if he has to go far afield. But much of his work is local so I doubt he drives very far, very often to a job. But I don’t think he’d turn down a job outright simply because it involved driving a distance. The thing to do is bid it for what it will cost you and if you don’t get it…well…you can’t work a job that’s going to cost you more then you make back from it.
My brother has a big Ford truck, but he also has a smaller one he can use when he doesn’t need the capacity of the big one. I expect that one’s getting a lot more use now. I remember when all those air foils started appearing on tractor-trailer rigs back in the late 70s and 80s. Before the first oil embargo it didn’t matter how much fuel one of those things burned because it was so cheap, and the profile of most of those big rigs was like a fist going down the highway. Then suddenly the truckers were having to find ways to squeeze out every little bit of milage they could and there was a new appreciation for air drag. Now you see them all the time on the big trucks. Something else I’m starting to see more of on American highways are the mid-sized and smaller European trucks and vans.
More fuel efficient automobiles will come and that’s a good thing, but if you really want to keep the cost of living down, investing in more fuel efficient trucks will do a lot more for the economy.
So I’m hitting up Google Images for Maybach photos like This One to dream over…
…because a photo is about as close as I’ll ever get to sitting behind the wheel of a Maybach in this life. This is why my TV gets so little use anymore, other then to play the occasional DVD. At the end of my day instead of lounging on the sofa flipping channels, I sit at the computer and wander around the web for a bit. Maybe it was because of all the news stories I saw yesterday about how the skyrocketing cost of gasoline is changing our lives, and I am afraid I’m living to see the end of the open road, but for some reason I started googling images of my fantasy car.
I wonder if I’m going to live to see then end of that breed too…the supercars…the high powered sportscars and the sumptuous luxury sedans that only the fabulously rich can afford. For me they’re not so much symbols of wealth, as icons of human engineering and craftsmanship. This is the best of the best of automotive engineering and craft. This is what you do when you set out to build the absolute best and no compromise anywhere. Every car maker should make one of these, as a statement of how serious they are about automobiles. It’s been the disillusionment of my lifetime, that none of the American car makers can be bothered to build one of these. A guy who ran the Cadillac division of GM once tried to…but the boardroom shot him down. Here in America, a luxury car is a status symbol first, and an automobile second…if that. Mechanical quality? Engineering? Hon…if the rubes staring at you as you drive past can’t see it, it doesn’t matter.
The Rolls used to be my fantasy car. In my teen years I had a brochure photo of the dashboard of a Silver Shadow tacked up to my bedroom wall. But the new Rolls is ugly. The Bentley is far and away the more beautiful car now in my opinion. But I just love the new Maybach. It’s not only sumptuous but state of the art technically. I just love it. Not the tank of a limousine 62, but the 57, which is for a driver not a chauffeur. Why anyone would buy a fantasy car and hand it over to a chauffeur is beyond me. Unless the rich can’t even be bothered to get their driver’s licenses.
So my eyes are roving all over the photo above…lingering on the leather upholstery and the burl walnut wood on the center console and the wheel, while my fingers are wondering what it would feel like to wrap themselves around it…and the geek in me eyeballs the video display…and I notice that the radio is set on a…huh…a shortwave band? Well in Europe the shortwave bands were used by broadcasters much more so then here in America. But I’ve got some old high school pals who would have had the same laugh I did seeing that…
Well listen you haven’t heard nothing yet! I’ve got right here in this car for your transatlantic driving pleasure, this fully alacrafted sea mattress shortwave radio, in this non-returnable non-disposable sinkline carrying case!
Ayutthaya – A body of a 40-year-old man with a cobra carcass in his head was found on a roadside here Sunday morning.
An preliminary autopsy also found that Wiroj Banlen, 40, was wearing a condom although he was putting on his trousers. No semen was found inside the condom.
His body was found on the side of a dirt road in Tambon Lamsai of Ayutthaya’s Wangnoi district at 7 am.
He was bitten several times by the snake on his right leg and on his cheeks.
His hands were clenching the dead cobra, whose body was bitten several times especially on its stomach.
The preliminary autopsy found scales of the snake in his mouth.
His body was sent for a full autopsy at a hospital.
This story is from Thailand, and the translation may be a tad…off. So I’m trying to unpack this. His body was found by the roadside. He was bitten several times by a cobra. Some of the bites were on his right leg, the others on his cheeks. I assume the cheek bites happened while he was trying to eat the cobra. His pants seem to have been at least partly undone and he was wearing a condom as though he was about to have sex, but hadn’t yet. I’m sitting here thinking that if there is a God it must have created human beings because a universe that obeys quantum physics just wasn’t strange enough.
Military engineers defused a giant bomb from World War II that was discovered in East London during construction for the 2012 Summer Olympics, a military spokesman said. The 2,200-pound bomb… started to tick at one point while being defused by a team of Royal Engineers from the British Army. Thousands of bombs fell on East London during World War II.
It strikes me as odd that this necessarily short “World Briefing” item avoids mentioning just who it was that dropped all those bombs on East London during WWII. Those bombs decide on their own to fall all over East London.
Er…what’s your point Dan? You think the American readers of the New York Times might not know where that bomb came from without being told? Hmmm… World War II bomb… East London… Now where the hell could that thing have come from… think… think… think…
Well it probably wasn’t the Japanese. Maybe the Times should have told its readers what that ticking sound signified too because goodness they might think the British had dug up a 2,200 pound Soviet era kitchen timer some poor East German refugee family brought back with them during the cold war, and promptly threw in a ditch when they saw how much better the kitchen timers in the west are. You never know. Maybe there’s a Trabant buried somewhere nearby…
I had work to do for a deadline this coming Wednesday and I figured I would be staying home Friday, and most of the weekend. Friday is my usual telecommute day, and at the end of it I usually drive down to Washington to gather with some friends at the 30 Degrees bar for drinks and a nice restaurant later. But this Friday I couldn’t make it because I had to spend that time at the computer in my home office instead.
When I came home last Thursday my little neighborhood street was packed almost solid with cars. This should not be a hard city street to find parking on because it’s a little dogleg of a side street that only has rowhouses on one side of it. On the other side are four widely spaced detached homes, some of which have their own parking pads anyway. So that side of the street is usually open. But we have two households here now on my end of the street, on the rowhouse side, that like to hog the available parking like they’re the only people who live here. One of them is a little gay diva who rents his house out to two other people and between them and their friends parking on the street there isn’t much space left. The other is a straight couple who just had a baby…so they’ve had family and friends over all week long. Another guy is moving and he’s had friends over helping out. The net result is that my little out of the way city street is suddenly hard to find parking on. Last Thursday I had to park halfway up the street, and then wait for a space near my house to open up. It wasn’t until Friday morning that I was finally able to park in front of my house.
So I started the weekend feeling reluctant to move the car anyway. Having to fight for a parking space here is something I’m not used to. In point of fact, I bought the house here on this street specifically because parking seemed to be no problem here, as opposed to some of the other densely rowhouse packed streets in the neighborhood. Now I’m seriously considering putting a parking pad in the back yard, which would eliminate the only yard I’ve ever had in my life. I kinda like having that little 8 by 15 foot patch of green grass back there…tiny as it is. But I need a place to park my car, and there is always the even smaller front lawn I can always make a fuss over.
I’ve been busy at the computer most of my waking time this weekend, getting stuff done for work. But I live within walking distance of two nice grocery stores, and Saturday evening after it had cooled down a bit, and then again early this morning, I was able to take a short walk to buy some food. I also took a brief cigar walk around the neighborhood late last night, when I started getting cabin fever. It’s a nice neighborhood to stroll around in, when it’s not sweltering.
But my cigar humidor is getting a tad empty. I toyed briefly this afternoon with the thought of taking a quick drive to my favorite cigar store in Cockeysville and loading up. So a few moments ago I checked outside to see what the parking situation looks like. It’s still bad, but not horrible. I thought it over for a moment. There were just a few spaces on the street, but later, as guests go back home for the work week, more will probably open up. But did I want to drive all the way out to Cockeysville just to buy cigars with gas prices being what they are now? I still have a few good cigars left in the box to tide me over until I need to buy something else out in Cockeysville.
Now…see what happened? I would probably be on the way home from my favorite cigar store right now, were it not for the price of gasoline. It is making less and less sense these days to drive somewhere for just one item. I can walk to two good grocery stores and a handful of drug stores to get most of my day to day necessities. The things I need to drive outside the beltway to get I now find myself carefully planning out. Instead of making several trips out there I try to make only one.
The net result being that car sits in front of my house a lot more then it did when I bought it. I’m still in new Mercedes love. I still go outside periodically and just…stare…at that car like I just brought it home. But you know…I’m finding I appreciate it all the more when I drive it less often. Driving it has become something of a special occasion now. The last time I bought gas was almost two weeks ago.
I doubt I’m the only person making these sorts of calculations because gas has become so expensive. I’ve noticed now for several weeks that traffic has been much, much lighter on the highways then usual. Thing is, I haven’t actually started spending less on things like food and other necessities. I’m holding off until I can combine trips, instead of getting stuff on an as-needed basis. If that’s what other people are doing, then this isn’t necessarily hurting retail too badly. On the other hand, I’m not shopping and impulse buying either. I’m just buying things I need. That’s probably hurting business. But the housing bubble burst would have done that without the gas price spike.
This blog is powered by WordPress and is hosted at Winters Web Works, who also did some custom design work (Thanks!). Some embedded content was created with the help of The Gimp. I proof with Google Chrome on either Windows, Linux or MacOS depending on which machine I happen to be running at the time.
