{"id":6262,"date":"2012-08-18T20:16:40","date_gmt":"2012-08-19T01:16:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/?p=6262"},"modified":"2012-08-18T20:20:43","modified_gmt":"2012-08-19T01:20:43","slug":"pissing-on-edward-r-murrow%e2%80%99s-grave%e2%80%a6continued","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/6262","title":{"rendered":"Pissing On Edward R. Murrow\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Grave\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6(continued)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Via friend and fellow Truth Wins Out Blogger Michael Airhart I get <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americablog.com\/2012\/08\/why-family-research-council-is-hate.html\">this link to John Aravosis going on a righteous tear<\/a> as to why the Family Research Council isn&#8217;t merely a pious group of conservative christians who just happen to disagree with same-sex marriage but is, in fact, an organization of calculating hate mongers who will shrink from no lie they think they can get away with. And thanks to useful tools like The Washington Post and Dana Milbank they can get away with a lot of them.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americablog.com\/2012\/08\/why-family-research-council-is-hate.html\">Why the Family Research Council is a hate group<\/a><\/h3>\n<p>At one point, I had the Congressional Research Service send me a copy of  every single document the Family Research Council had written about  gays, and then I had CRS get me every single document listed in the FRC  doc&#8217;s footnotes. I.e., all the &#8220;original sources&#8221; for the Family  Research Council&#8217;s anti-gay claims.<\/p>\n<p>And there were a lot of them.  \u00a0At the time, FRC&#8217;s list of footnotes  could be nearly as long as the written part of the document itself.<\/p>\n<p>What did I find when I went through the original sources cited in the  footnotes?  \u00a0I found that nearly every single footnote was a lie.  \u00a0Not a  lie in the conventional sense &#8211; meaning, they didn&#8217;t make up a source  that didn&#8217;t exist.  \u00a0Rather, they did things like quoting a damning  opinion from a judge in a court case without mention that the judge was  in the minority, that the gays had actually won the case they were  citing.<\/p>\n<p>Or they&#8217;d quote a study with a hideous conclusion about gays and  lesbians, only for you to realize later that the actual quote in the  study was rather benign &#8211; instead, FRC &#8220;forgot&#8221; to put and end-quotation  mark on the quote, added an ellipse, and then put their own damning  conclusion.  \u00a0Let me give you a made-up example of a quote about gays to  who you how the family research council did this.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;This study looked at 45 gay men, and 35  lesbians.  \u00a0It was clear from the subjects that gay men and lesbians face  greater societal pressures in their day to day lives&#8230; which makes  gays and lesbians much more likely to rip the heads off small bunnies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Wow, rip the heads off small bunnies &#8211; that&#8217;s pretty bad.  \u00a0But hey, it&#8217;s a <em>real<\/em> study in a <em>real<\/em> journal, so it has to be true.  \u00a0Except of course that the real quote  from the actual study ends at the ellipse, while the FRC added its own  opinion after the ellipse, while &#8220;forgetting&#8221; to put the end quote, so  it looks like the FRC&#8217;s opinion is part of the official quote from the  reputable study.<\/p>\n<p>Gosh, I wonder how that happened?<\/p>\n<p>It went on and on like this, through hundreds of footnotes.  \u00a0I went  through the original research of the various studies they cited and  found that the study reached no such conclusion like the FRC claimed it  did.  \u00a0And on and on and on.<\/p>\n<p>These are not honest people simply expressing a contrarian view of  politics, like Democrats and Republicans do every day in Washington.<\/p>\n<p>Tony Perkins, FRC&#8217;s head, got on TV a few months ago to debate whether  gay parents were as good as straight parents.  \u00a0Perkins said &#8220;no,&#8221; and he  had the study to prove it.  \u00a0Perkins explained how studies have proven  that kids need a mom and a dad.  \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/gay.americablog.com\/2012\/05\/cnn-refuses-to-take-tony-perkins-lies.html\">What Perkins didn&#8217;t bother telling you was that those studies compared kids with a mom and a dad to kids with a single parent<\/a>.   \u00a0The studies never looked at the relative merits of gay parents.  \u00a0Gay  parents might have been just as good, or heck, even better than straight  parents.  \u00a0The study didn&#8217;t even look at it.  \u00a0But Perkins cited the  study as proof that straight parents were better than gay parents, when  the study had nothing to do with it.<\/p>\n<p>And again, Dana, if you actually go through the FRC&#8217;s &#8220;research,&#8221; you  will find this kind of &#8220;mistake&#8221; happening again and again.  \u00a0It happens  so often, it&#8217;s happened for twenty years now that I&#8217;ve been tracking  them, that you come to realize that lying for the Family Research  Council isn&#8217;t a flaw, it&#8217;s a feature.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s more&#8230;you should read it. \u00a0 That the beltway media has a habit of looking the other way at conservative hate groups so long as their talking heads dress nicely and refrain from wearing hoods, never gets any less repulsive no matter how often you see it. \u00a0 But it stopped long ago being just a problem for the gay community. \u00a0 This endemic disdain for what used to be journalism&#8217;s basic function, to get the facts, get them right and get them out to the public, is a big reason why one of our two major parties has walked off the crazy cliff, and now threatens to take the United States of America with it.<\/p>\n<p>As your gay neighbors have watched the fanatics in the course of waging their scorched earth culture war shove any pretense of honor, reason and morality from their way, so we have watched one news organization after another, one journalist after another, tuck their tails between their legs and run, run away from democracy&#8217;s front lines. \u00a0 Speaking truth to fanaticism, let alone to power, will never get you the big bucks. \u00a0 When calling a fact a fact and a lie a lie means raising the ire of the rich and powerful, or perhaps one or more of their batshit crazy friends, it&#8217;s safer on the paycheck to just stick to stenography. \u00a0 There are two sides to every story, but never a factual side to any story. \u00a0 Print the controversy, pass along the press releases and hit the bar at days end. \u00a0 It&#8217;s only a job. \u00a0 Remember how, in the aftermath of the Proposition 8 trial, so many mainstream journalmalists were shocked, shocked, to discover there was so little substance to the opposition to same-sex marriage? <em>What did we know&#8230;it&#8217;s not like our job is digging up and reporting the facts or anything&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Via friend and fellow Truth Wins Out Blogger Michael Airhart I get this link to John Aravosis going on a righteous tear as to why the Family Research Council isn&#8217;t merely a pious group of conservative christians who just happen to disagree with same-sex marriage but is, in fact, an organization of calculating hate mongers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[37,21],"class_list":["post-6262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-thumping-my-pulpit","tag-our-feckless-news-media","tag-the-abyss"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}