{"id":624,"date":"2007-03-19T08:48:13","date_gmt":"2007-03-19T13:48:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/624"},"modified":"2007-03-19T09:08:57","modified_gmt":"2007-03-19T14:08:57","slug":"how-an-artist-sees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/624","title":{"rendered":"How An Artist Sees&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a really interesting article up on <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/cognitivedaily\/2007\/03\/artists_look_different.php\">Cognitive Daily that looks at the difference between how a trained psychologist looks at a scene, and how an artist does<\/a>.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s one comparison.&nbsp; The yellow lines represent the eyes of two different viewers roving over the image&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"181\" alt=\" \" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/cognitivedaily\/upload\/2007\/03\/vart2.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>I knew right away which one was which, because I know how my own eyes scan, and because I&#8217;ve actually talked this over with others like me who draw, but also photographers too.&nbsp; The thing is, the human eye\/brain system tends to lock straight on to what it determines is the import stuff.&nbsp; That&#8217;s probably because natural selection enhances a critter&#8217;s ability to size up a situation quickly.&nbsp; Even those of us with a creative, exploring turn of mind, when we&#8217;re just starting to learn to draw, or to do photography, need work at looking, really looking at&#8230;well&#8230;what we&#8217;re looking at&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Art teachers have noted that when beginning students attempt to draw accurate portraits, they tend to exaggerate the size of key features: eyes and mouths are too big relative to the size of the head. Trained artists learn to ignore these temptations and draw the world as it really appears. Even world-famous artists such as Leonardo da Vinci have had to resort to tricks such as looking at their subject through a divided pane of glass in order to render proportions accurately.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And it&#8217;s true.&nbsp; Even now there are times I will try looking at my own drawings in in a mirror, when I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m getting it right.&nbsp; But I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s not all a matter of training either.&nbsp; This would be a good experiment to run on a group of children, and then follow them into adulthood to see which ones took up art as a pursuit, to see how differently their eyes explored the world before the training set in.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll bet the training only enhances a tendency that is there to begin with, to rove over it all, absorbed, curious, fascinated.&nbsp; I remember when I was a kid, I would be drawn to even the smallest details of any scene that held my interest.&nbsp; The delicate colors in a sunset&#8230;or in the ripples on water, as in the photos above.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll bet the way my eyes roved over that photo when I first looked at it a few moments ago, wasn&#8217;t all that different from how they would have looked at it when I was a kid.&nbsp; The difference would only be experience.&nbsp; Now I know why I&#8217;m doing it.&nbsp; You can&#8217;t render what you&#8217;re not really seeing.&nbsp; You have to look.&nbsp; Deliberately look.&nbsp;  That&#8217;s the training.\n<\/p>\n<p>But here&#8217;s the inner reflex: This is a beautiful world.&nbsp; Look&#8230;look&#8230;there is more there then first greets the eye.&nbsp; See?&nbsp; It is richer then it first appears.&nbsp; Look.&nbsp; Look.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a really interesting article up on Cognitive Daily that looks at the difference between how a trained psychologist looks at a scene, and how an artist does.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s one comparison.&nbsp; The yellow lines represent the eyes of two different viewers roving over the image&#8230; I knew right away which one was which, because I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56,1],"tags":[57,29],"class_list":["post-624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-art","category-uncategorized","tag-drawing","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}