{"id":462,"date":"2006-12-06T08:03:34","date_gmt":"2006-12-06T13:03:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/462"},"modified":"2006-12-06T12:15:57","modified_gmt":"2006-12-06T17:15:57","slug":"separate-but-equalisnt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/462","title":{"rendered":"Separate But Equal&#8230;Isn&#8217;t."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From Good As You, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goodasyou.org\/good_as_you\/2006\/10\/jersey_lawmaker.html\">some thoughts about marriage verses civil unions<\/a>&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The<strong> &quot;Whites Only&quot;<\/strong> fountain once dispensed the same water as the <strong>&quot;Coloreds&quot;<\/strong> one did; but the implications of having to walk the alternate line to obtain the H20 spoke volumes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Via Blue Jersey, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bluejersey.com\/showDiary.do?diaryId=3368\">here&#8217;s an example<\/a>  of how the consequences of separate but equal play out in the lives of gay people&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Consider Paula Long and Rosalind Heggs of Camden who have been together over 15 years. They were registered as domestic partners and also had a civil union from Vermont. Under New Jersey law, they have hospital visitation rights and the right to make decisions on behalf of each other when the other is sick. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s on paper, but when Rosalind had a heart attack and needed a blood transfusion, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.philly.com\/mld\/inquirer\/news\/local\/15873272.htm\">the hospital refused to allow Paula to give consent<\/a>. Paula even had a highlighted copy of the relevant law with her, but that didn&#8217;t matter to the hospital. <em>They demanded to see their marriage certificate.<\/em> (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=46jccPGRmIg&amp;eurl=\">see video of their story<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This story happens over and over again from one end of this country to the other, in red states and blue alike, and it&#8217;s indicative of a mindset.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rhinotimes.com\/greensboro\/archives\/021904\/osc2.html\">Here&#8217;s that mindset in a nutshell<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>However emotionally bonded a pair of homosexual lovers may feel themselves to be, what they are doing is not marriage. Nor does society benefit in any way from treating it as if it were.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em> However emotionally bonded a pair of homosexual lovers may feel themselves to be&#8230;<\/em>&nbsp; Bigots such as Orson Scott Card cannot, will never, acknowledge there is a bond between same sex couples, but only, and grudgingly, that they may feel themselves to have one.&nbsp; Card later wrote another column, in which he reduced the struggle of gay and lesbian Americans for simple justice, to <A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.ornery.org\/essays\/warwatch\/2004-03-28-1.html\">a childish demand for &quot;fairness&quot;<\/A>&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The single most effective argument being used to gain support for the redefinition of marriage to mean anything, therefore nothing, is this:<\/p>\n<p>&quot;It&#8217;s not fair that homosexuals can&#8217;t get married just like heterosexuals.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>This argument is only effective because nobody is bothering to define &quot;fairness&quot; or to figure out whether the result will be in any way more fair than the hitherto universal definition of marriage.<\/p>\n<p>When our kids were little, we made it a very clear rule in our family that fairness didn&#8217;t mean that everybody got exactly what anybody else got.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Suppose we buy a dress for your sister,&quot; I said to my son.  &quot;Would you want us to get a dress for you too?&quot;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Never mind for a moment, the brain dead sexism in that example (picture Card telling his daughter, &quot;suppose we buy blue jeans for your brother.&nbsp; Would you want us to get blue jeans for you too?&quot;&nbsp; &quot;Well&#8230;yeah dad&#8230;why not?&quot;&nbsp; But maybe females aren&#8217;t allowed to wear pants in Card&#8217;s family&#8230;)&nbsp; Just look at it for a moment.&nbsp; Card is saying there, that to ask hospital staff to let you be with your other half as they lay sick, and maybe even dying, is like a child throwing a tantrum because daddy didn&#8217;t bring him a present too.&nbsp; Read that entire column, and if you aren&#8217;t a bigot like he is, one sickening thing just leaps out at you like a ghoul at a fun house, and laughs in your face: nowhere in that column is there even the slightest hint that Card can see there may be a deep and profound bond of love between a same sex couple.&nbsp; It just doesn&#8217;t even cross his mind.<\/p>\n<p><em>Homosexuals don&#8217;t love, they just have sex.<\/em>&nbsp; Homosexual sex.&nbsp; Because they&#8217;re disfunctional&#8230;.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>But it is grossly unfair to demand, in the name of &quot;fairness,&quot; that the normal pattern of marriage and family be deprived of its privileged position in our society, just so a few people can feel better about dysfunctions that even they insist are nobody&#8217;s fault.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This is the mindset that same sex couples have to face every time they try to assert their rights as a couple.&nbsp; The hospital staff that kept Paula Long out of the room where her other half was suffering from a heart attack, treated their union like it was some kind of pathetic imitation of their own, because that&#8217;s exactly what they thought of it.&nbsp; Equal marriage rights won&#8217;t change their minds about that.&nbsp; But what it can do is warn them upfront, that if they let their cheap conceits and bar stool prejudices devastate the lives of innocent people, there will be consequences.&nbsp;&nbsp; Separate but equal on the other hand, merely validates their prejudices and conceits.&nbsp; As long as they believe they can put the knife in our hearts and get away with it, they&#8217;ll keep doing it.&nbsp; Because it is unfair to demand that normal families loose their privileged position in our society, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gayhealth.com\/templates\/1165409626906735407187\/society\/legal?record=738&amp;trycookie=1?record=738\">just so a few people can feel better about their dysfunctions<\/a> .<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>When Bill Flanigan admitted his partner Robert Daniel to the hospital because of AIDS-related complications his loss was tremendous.<\/p>\n<p>Kept from Daniel during his last hours alive, Flanigan was denied the chance to say goodbye to his partner of more than five years. He filed a lawsuit against the University of Maryland Medical System in Baltimore City Circuit Court on February 27.<\/p>\n<p>Not only was Flanigan refused the right to be with Daniel, he was also not permitted to share Daniel&rsquo;s treatment wishes with his physicians, according to a statement issued by Lambda Legal. All because the staff from the Maryland Medical System Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore said Flanigan was not family.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>It was only after Daniel&rsquo;s sister and mother arrived from out of town that the Shock Trauma Center released information on Daniel&rsquo;s status that had been repeatedly denied to Flanigan, and allowed the entire family &#8212; including Flanigan &#8212; to see Daniel. But it was too late &#8212; Daniel was no longer conscious and his eyes were taped shut, and his wishes not to have life prolonging measures performed had been denied. There were tubes in his throat.<\/p>\n<p>That was particularly hard for Flanigan to take.<\/p>\n<p>At one point Daniel briefly regained consciousness, according to a nurse, and he tried to pull out the breathing tube. In response hospital staff tied down Daniel&rsquo;s arms.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em>You want us to get a dress for you too?<\/em><\/p>\n<p align=center>\n<object width=\"425\" height=\"350\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/dyXEaR-qdyg\"><\/param><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/dyXEaR-qdyg\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" wmode=\"transparent\" width=\"425\" height=\"350\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Good As You, some thoughts about marriage verses civil unions&#8230; The &quot;Whites Only&quot; fountain once dispensed the same water as the &quot;Coloreds&quot; one did; but the implications of having to walk the alternate line to obtain the H20 spoke volumes. Via Blue Jersey, here&#8217;s an example of how the consequences of separate but equal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[16,12],"class_list":["post-462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-marriage","tag-the-struggle-for-our-lives"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brucegarrett.com\/brucelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}