Another Reason To Hate The RIAA…
As some of you probably already know, the RIAA won its case against a Minnesota woman who was accused of sharing songs through Kazaa. The judge told the jury that the RIAA didn’t have to prove that anyone actually copied the files, or that the woman had herself put them on the network…only that she own the computer in question, and that the files Had been made available.
In a lot of unsavory ways, the RIAA is like the owners in baseball, whose only contribution to the sport is to act as a gateway to the game, through which both players and fans have to pass. The fans hate them, the players hate them, but they own the game, so to speak, so you have to deal with them on their terms, like it or not. But unlike baseball fans and players, music lovers and musicians now have a way to bypass completely the RIAA, and I think it’s time now that more of us concentrated on doing just that. There are plenty of legal means, if online sharing still pricks your conscience.
Rather then buy a new CD, I’ve started looking for titles I want on the used market. I get a CD at half, to a quarter the price, and it rips to my iPod just as easily as a new one, and the sweet part of it is that the RIAA doesn’t get a penny of my money on it. Of course, neither to the musicians…but if they want to sell to me directly, as Radiohead and others are now doing, I’ll be more then happy to buy from them.
What looks like commercial suicide is, in today’s reality, sound business sense. Records, CDs or downloads now have all become downgraded to the status of promotional tools – useful to sell concert tickets and fan paraphernalia. While there is still good money to be made in music, and particularly on the concert circuit, the record business – blame it on piracy, too many CD giveaways or the advent of the recordable CD – is a busted flush.
A revealing story doing the rounds in America tells of a young rock band who decided to stop selling their CDs at gigs after they discovered that by offering their CDs for $10 they were cannibalising sales of their $20 T-shirts. The truth now is that a rudimentary cotton garment with a band logo stamped across it that has probably been manufactured for pennies in a Third World sweatshop costs about twice as much as an album recorded in a state-of-the-art western studio. And even at that price, recorded music isn’t selling.
That Times of London article relates something I’ve seen happening for quite some time now. Once upon a time concerts were promotional tools used by the record industry to sell albums. That’s completely reversed now, and recorded music exists mostly to give people a reason to go see concerts. And go they are…
The reprioritisation in recent years of live music over the recorded variety has been dramatic. Attendance at arena shows rose here by 11% last year. By the time 2007 bows out, 450 music festivals will have taken place in the UK.
Every week brings news of another frenzied assault on the box office. Last Monday Ticket-master reported that 20,000 tickets for the Spice Girls’ first reunion concert at London’s O2 arena in December sold out in 38 seconds, with 1m fans registering to buy. Three weeks back more than a million clamoured for seats at the forthcoming Led Zeppelin reunion. Glastonbury disposed of its 135,000 weekend passes for this year’s event within two hours – taking more than £21m in the process.
Ticket prices, especially for A-list artists, have soared as the price of CDs has tumbled…
Music, is a performing art, unlike say, painting (William Alexander and his student Bob Ross notwithstanding). A recording can only capture a performance. It’s great to be able to do that, some performances should live forever, and its wonderful to be living in an age where you can carry a thousand performances around with you on your hip and listen to them whenever and wherever you want. But the soul of music is the stage, not the recording studio.
October 9th, 2007 at 5:05 pm
Once upon a time concerts were promotional tools used by the record industry to sell albums. That’s completely reversed now, and recorded music exists mostly to give people a reason to go see concerts…
…and festivals. Most of the UK hippy scene revolves around the Folk and Psy scenes, both of which are about experiencing music as part of a group and are heavily festival-oriented. The best way to listen to Lou Rhodes or Oddur Runnarson is to go see them live – good as they are, the studio recordings just don’t capture the atmosphere of a small 100-150 person gig. At the other end of the scale, being part of a crowd of two to four thousand hippies and trancers, dancing to acts like Shpongle, Phutureprimitive, Slackbaba or the Commercial Hippies, is equally unforgettable – especially when you have costumed dancers, poi, jugglers and other performers. A studio recording cannot begin to compare to watching a couple of thousand people when a load of them are dressed like this:
Music isn’t just about listening to sound any more. It’s been that for over half a century now, but there’s a limit to what can be gained from that. Instead music is increasingly about witnessing, experiencing and even participating in the performance.
October 9th, 2007 at 5:06 pm
Hmmm, it didn’t like the HTML. The URL for the pic is this:
http://sirenz.mine.nu/sirenz/images/gallery/20061028_tribeoffrog/images/003.jpg
October 9th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Mmmm…. I didn’t know you couldn’t use HTML in the comments. I just tried to find an easy WordPress setting for that I could turn off and couldn’t, so I reckon I need to research that a bit. Sorry…
I have comment moderation turned on for comments with hyperlinks in them because of spammers I’d had trouble with lately. I can turn that off now though I think.