Via Pam’s House Blend…   I see the wingnuts are on again about God’s Grand Design as revealed in our bodies…

There are attributes of marriage that same-sex couples will never achieve. But in the minds of radical activists, getting the label and a piece of paper saying so will be close enough.

For instance, a woman who engages in lesbianism will never know the joy of lovemaking that creates within her the product of that union — an actual human life. She will never know the security of a true man protecting her from the dragons of the world and providing for her an environment where she can nurture and give love to that little life once it arrives, or the stamp of approval that God puts on such an experience. And because she and her partner know this, they must defy reason, biology and sexual function to create children and experiences that serve as faulty substitutes for that God-ordained picture.

You have to figure a true man is someone who prefers his women helpless, which somehow doesn’t make any sense but then expecting sense from a brick brained idiot like Kevin McCullough (the author) is a bit like expecting a pig to shit pearls.  McCallough isn’t just pissing on the happy couplehood of lesbians there, but also every heterosexual couple that cannot have children of their own too.  So any children they manage to have must also serve only as faulty substitutes for the God-ordained picture thing. 

You need to notice this: What McCullough is saying there, is that Any Child not naturally brought into a family can only be a faulty substitute for the Real Thing.  Adopted children cannot be loved and cherished like Real Children can.  Children conceived by various medical means likewise cannot be loved and cherished like Real Children.  Their families can never be as loving, as caring, as nurturing as Real Families can…they can only be faulty substitutes for the God Ordained picture thing.  You have to love how, in attacking the households of gay couples, these gutter crawling maggots show just how much they regard themselves as holier then…well…just about everyone else, not just gays.  And if you think they don’t mean their rhetoric to apply equally to childless heterosexual couples too, think again. 

But even when it comes to reason, biology, and sexual function, McCullough doesn’t get it right.

Likewise, a man who seeks his perverse kicks by depositing the seed of life in, shall we say, non-life-giving cavities, may know orgasm, but never complete union, as he uses anatomy in ways for which the Creator did not create it.

It’s called the prostate gland Kevin.  Massaging the prostate gland, which is what happens during a certain kind of male to male sex, can bring a human male to a right dandy orgasm.  Now…I am unaware of any other gland in the human body that will produce such a result when it’s rubbed.  In fact, most of them will probably produce a sharp stab of pain when you do that to them.  But not that particular gland, in that particular location in the male anatomy.  The conclusion is obvious.  God did, in fact, intend for males to be fucked.  It probably helps if they’re gay though.

I keep bringing up the prostate because it’s something worth paying attention to.  It wasn’t lax moral standards that did that.  It wasn’t hedonism.  It wasn’t Godlessness.  It was millions of years of adaptive evolution that gave that to human males, even the ones with absolutely no use for it at all.  Or, if you don’t believe in evolution, fine.  Then God did it.  But there it is.  If you’re going to go on a pulpit thumping rant about God’s design, the fucking take some notice of God’s design willya?  Open your goddamn eyes every now and then and fucking take a look at what God hath wrought…okay?  Just a suggestion.

By coincidence I came across this article in the Economist just prior to reading that Pam’s House Blend post, which seems to do nothing more then idly wonder why homosexuality exists in nature.  It starts off with a pretty good observation though…

WHAT is taught in a country’s schools reveals much about the national psyche. The Norwegian curriculum requires that all 14-year-olds learn about homosexuality. Assisting with this education, the National History Museum at the University of Oslo has just opened an exhibition of gay animals.

“Against Nature?” does not tell zoologists anything new. Homosexuality has been recorded in some 1,500 species so far, and been well documented in about a third of these cases; it has been known since the time of Aristotle, who thought he witnessed two male hyenas having sex with one another. But the exhibition’s purpose is not to educate zoologists. It is to persuade the public that, as there are gay whales and worms, gay humans do not disturb the natural order.

And ends with another…

Taking lessons on sexuality from the birds and the bees itself requires first accepting something not taught ubiquitously outside Norway—that evolution occurs by natural selection.

Ya think?  Well that leaves a large swath of the United States out.  We have crackpots here who can’t even divine God’s will from the evidence of our own bodies, let alone the workings of nature.