Bruce Garrett Cartoon
The Cartoon Gallery

A Coming Out Story
A Coming Out Story

My Photo Galleries
New and Improved!

Past Web Logs
The Story So Far archives

My Amazon.Com Wish List

My Myspace Profile

Bruce Garrett's Profile
Bruce Garrett's Facebook profile


Blogs I Read!
Alicublog

Wayne Besen

Beyond Ex-Gay
(A Survivor's Community)

Box Turtle Bulletin

Chrome Tuna

Daily Kos

Mike Daisy's Blog

The Disney Blog

Envisioning The American Dream

Eschaton

Ex-Gay Watch

Hullabaloo

Joe. My. God

Peterson Toscano

Progress City USA

Slacktivist

SLOG

Fear the wrath of Sparky!

Wil Wheaton



Gone But Not Forgotten

The Rittenhouse Review

Steve Gilliard's News Blog

Steve Gilliard's Blogspot Site



Great Cartoon Sites!

Howard Cruse Central

Tripping Over You
Tripping Over You

XKCD

Commando Cody Monthly

Scandinavia And The World

Dope Rider

The World Of Kirk Anderson

Ann Telnaes' Cartoon Site

Bors Blog

John K

Penny Arcade




Other News & Commentary

Lead Stories

Amtrak In The Heartland

Corridor Capital

Railway Age

Maryland Weather Blog

Foot's Forecast

All Facts & Opinions

Baltimore Crime

Cursor

HinesSight

Page One Q
(GLBT News)


Michelangelo Signorile

The Smirking Chimp

Talking Points Memo

Truth Wins Out

The Raw Story

Slashdot




International News & Views

BBC

NIS News Bulletin (Dutch)

Mexico Daily

The Local (Sweden)




News & Views from Germany

Spiegel Online

The Local

Deutsche Welle

Young Germany




Fun Stuff

It's not news. It's FARK

Plan 59

Pleasant Family Shopping

Discount Stores of the 60s

Retrospace

Photos of the Forgotten

Boom-Pop!

Comics With Problems

HMK Mystery Streams




Mercedes Love!

Mercedes-Benz USA

Mercedes-Benz TV

Mercedes-Benz Owners Club of America

MBCA - Greater Washington Section

BenzInsider

Mercedes-Benz Blog

BenzWorld Forum

February 23rd, 2009

It’s Not The Mirror’s Fault You’re Stupid

There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.
-Ansel Adams

I am a graphic artist.  That is to say, I express via imagery.  I don’t perform on stage.  I don’t write.  I am not a composer of music.  I paint.  I draw.  But mostly I take one of my cameras and go for these little strolls around my world.  I am a photographer.  Not a professional nor a recognized artist, but a serious amateur.  I have some galleries up here on the web site you can peruse if you like.  They’re typical of what I do.  Photography as been a passion of mine ever since I was in grade school.  I think I can say after all these years of doing it, that I have a distinctive voice.

I don’t like a lot of what I produce.  That is to say, I would rather be producing something a tad more cheerful, or sensuous maybe, or beautiful.  But I have this urge to produce a lot of this…

…and…this…

 

 

…and…this…

 

…that I can’t turn away from.  I have to make these images.  It’s what I do.  I take a camera, decide if I’m in a color or black and white frame of mind just then, and go for a wander.  Sooner or later something I’ve never been able to put words to tugs me over to something, and then I am exploring a subject.  Snap…circle it a bit…snap…circle some more…snap…snap…snap…  It’s what I do when I get a camera in my hands.   Oh yes…sometimes I get a chance to do a little of this…

 

I love this one…but even this, if you look at it carefully, has a sense of the other stuff in it just below the surface. 

For almost a decade I gave up taking photographs because I couldn’t stand to look at what was coming out of me anymore.  This is hard for some folks of a…shall we say…religious right persuasion…to get about the artsy tofu and brie types they just love to loath…let alone liberals in general.  It isn’t so much If it feels good do it, as You do what you must.  As a matter of fact yes, it is entirely possible to be consumed with a subject matter you don’t much like, and still feel absolutely compelled to approach it with fierce honesty.  But honesty is even less welcome then art in the mega-mall cathedrals of the heartland.

Via Sullivan…  It seems they don’t like looking at pictures of themselves at Patrick Henry College

My first preview of at photographer Jona Frank’s book of portraits about Patrick Henry College occurred through Mother Jones, where it appeared alongside image galleries on phone sex operators, Aryan outfitters, and women in Afghanistan. (Mother Jones’ photo galleries reflect a wide variety of topics, but I’m mentioning the ones it promoted alongside the photos from Frank’s second book, Right: Portraits from the Evangelical Ivy League.)

The students of Patrick Henry College, the nation’s first residential college designed for young people who grew up as homeschoolers, looked awfully stiff and serious. I asked Ed Veith, a professor of literature and provost of the college, for his thoughts. Veith sent along a memo that he wrote to Patrick Henry students when he saw the book:

I was greatly angered when I saw the book Right: Portraits from the Evangelical Ivy League by the photographer Jona Frank. The book features pictures of many of you — portrayed in the [worst] way possible — with an accompanying text that plays to all the leftwing stereotypes about Christians and conservatives. The dishonesty of the artist is staggering: she posed you in stiff and awkward positions and told you not to smile; then she caricatured you as stiff, awkward, and without a sense of humor. In reality, I know that you PHC students are lively and interesting, with vibrant and highly-individualistic personalities. I think that Ms. Frank, who hung around campus for months and who even visited some of your families, betrayed your trust, violated your privacy, and distorted your identity.

Since writing to Veith, I’ve found another collection of Frank’s PHC images at Newsweek. That collection includes a narration by Frank, in which she speaks with clear affection for these students. Newsweek’s gallery is well worth a visit, as Frank’s narration is so warm and engaging.

If the photographer was any good…and Frank’s photos can put you in mind of another Frank in their straightforwardness…then her images are honest representations of what she saw, what she found when she went to Patrick Henry.  But you have to understand what Adams is saying in that quote I put at the top of this post.  The photographer is always present in every image.  But so are you, the viewer.  Frank didn’t set out to preach and not seeing the sermon he expected out of her, Veith got angry.  But not every negative review, is a bad review.

[Update…]  So I bought a copy of Frank’s photo book.  It’s good…but I wouldn’t put her in the same class as Robert Frank.  Most of the photos are posed.  Few are the kind of beautiful human moments frozen out of time shots that Frank did so astonishingly well.  But Robert Frank casts a large shadow over all of us.  He’s one of Photography’s perfect masters.  Jona Frank’s work here is good, she works well with her subjects and all her photographs are taken in their environment.  You get the sense of how they fit together, how the people and their environment are each expressions of the other.  But she is not a beachcomber searching for the stray seashell, the random pebble that tells stories of the open sea.  She does environmental portraiture and she’s good at it.  Robert Frank did moments in time.  Different stuff.

2 Responses to “It’s Not The Mirror’s Fault You’re Stupid”

  1. Bob C Says:

    I’ve been thinking about infrared a lot lately. Not just in the photographic/video sense, but also in the (Almost metaphysical/metaphorical) universal and wonderful natural electromagnetic spectrum…..and what it might, or might not be doing to us.
    I have dissmissed the notion that the secret NSA Sasquatch Homeland Security cabal has begun banning infrared technology, as was posited by another conspiracy nut.
    But what IS infrared in the photographic sense? Is it just a filter that cuts out everything BUT the infrared? And if so, then how is it visable in the photographs? Is the infrared range ‘dropped down’ to a visable range? And ARE there ‘things’ hiding in the infrared spectrum? Or other ends of the electromagnetic spectrum?
    Other then that, I’ve always enjoyed and admired your photography! I wish it was something I could get into more….but just doing hack-videos of bands, I should probably just stick to sound and audio engineering. And again, Ihave to wonder what is hiding in the sound freq spectrum beyond our hearing ability? And can you bounce a light, such as infrared or UV off of an ion source to vibrate it slow/fast enough to expand and contract air (Or another material that can then vibrate air) in a controlable way that could produce HUGE volumes in a box the size of a shoebox rather then a sub/bass box that weighs 500 pounds?

  2. Bruce Says:

    I’ve read your notes.  Infrared in the photographic sense is a little slight of hand.  The film is sensitive to a set of wavelengths in that region, but of course what you are looking at is still what we see in the wavelengths we can see in.  Color images in infrared are "false colors" – colors we can see mapped to parts of the spectrum we can’t. 

    FYI, a lot of Hubble images are like that.  Certain colors in the photos of gas clouds and galaxies are mapped to the emissions of various elements like oxygen and helium and such.  They are good approximations but our eyes wouldn’t see that precisely if we were out in space looking.  They don’t see in a lot of those frequencies for one thing, and for another human eyes aren’t that sensitive anyway.  The light from distant galaxies and gas clouds is pretty dim, compared to what our eyes evolved to deal with. If you were in a spaceship cruising between galaxies and could look out a window, you actually wouldn’t see very much. 

    If you want to ponder things that are hiding from us, consider there are not only the frequencies we cannot sense, but also that which is below the threshold of perception.  Cats and owls see very well at night because of the reflective coating on their retinas gives their receptor cells a second chance at getting a hit.  I’m told they sacrifice a little detail in the image for that.  They probably see a great deal that we don’t, but they see it less clearly.  For their purposes it’s good enough though I’m sure.

    Black and white infrared photography is less misleading in that you know (or should) that it’s only mapping out the infrared part of the spectrum.  Its like bat squeaks pitched downward to where our ears can hear them.  We don’t see in those wavelengths, so we use technology that, in effect, pitches down the light to tell us what is there that our eyes can’t naturally see.  But you have to realize when you are looking at infrared photography that this is what it is.

    Human senses aren’t as keen as many of planet earth’s other critters, but we make up for it in our technology.  I’m not sure how anything can hide anywhere in the electro-magnetic spectrum these days.  Physicists and astronomers have gone to great lengths to make the whole thing accessible to human inspection because each part of it tells us something about the nature of our universe.  And especially these days, astronomers are interested in the infrared.  As the universe expands, the most distant objects become more and more red shifted.  Some of the most distant stuff is so completely red shifted now that it is simply not see-able in the visible part of the spectrum anymore.  There is intense interest in infrared part of the spectrum now, because it can tell us so much about the early universe.  The next generation space telescope will work mostly there.

    There is a lot that is hiding from us in the ultra and sub sonic sound frequencies.  Just ask dogs, bats and whales.  (grin) But it isn’t so much hiding from us, as talking past us.  You could say most of the universe is talking past us.  But we are learning how to listen.

Leave a Reply

Visit The Woodward Class of '72 Reunion Website For Fun And Memories, WoodwardClassOf72.com


What I'm Currently Reading...




What I'm Currently Watching...




What I'm Currently Listening To...




Comic Book I've Read Recently...



web
stats

This page and all original content copyright © 2022 by Bruce Garrett. All rights reserved. Send questions, comments and hysterical outbursts to: bruce@brucegarrett.com

This blog is powered by WordPress and is hosted at Winters Web Works, who also did some custom design work (Thanks!). Some embedded content was created with the help of The Gimp. I proof with Google Chrome on either Windows, Linux or MacOS depending on which machine I happen to be running at the time.